05-02-2016, 03:20 AM
Albert Doyle Wrote:To show the extent of Fetzer's insanity his crew was claiming Jeff Bauman, the man at the Boston Marathon with his leg bone sticking out while being escorted to help, was a crisis actor with a fake horrific prosthesis making it look like his legs were blown off. The insanity of this claim is anyone could do basic research and find Mr Bauman's relatives or friends and ask them if he had good legs before the bombing. Or his doctor. The fact Fetzer seriously promoted this claim is grounds for Cuckoo land alone. We're talking the full Carmen Miranda fruit basket...
Crazy. But crazy like a fox.
Each time Fetzer, or a Halbig for example, drops a load on the carpet, they taint by association all other researchers and make a subject taboo for "normal" "sane" people whilst simultaneously providing perfect cover for the lapdog media and "academics" to totally ignore the substantive issues around an event.
UFOlogy is a classical example of this. All the real secret space vehicles, bizarre but real mind experiments and channelling experiments - everything that sounds the craziest - is the best documented; but very few are prepared to discuss it because of the virtual certainty of thread hijacking, disinformation and guilt by association.
Likewise with Sandy Hook - there is some stuff associated with it that is almost unthinkable in its evil and the implications of it, but no one will seriously look at it now, due to the Fetzer-Halbig-Shafquat circus.
Ditto 9/11. Ditto so many others.
And look at the JFK and RFK murders. Some extremely outre things are well documented, some bizarre (to the uninitiated) elements such as duplicates of Oswald - but with a miasma of absurd claims courtesy of Fetzer et al good information goes begging and the undoubted still undiscovered films, pictures and even witness testimony goes unreported.
It isn't accidental.
One of the worst things Fetzer has done - in an Alex Jones type way - is to glom on to something real, but add absurd details or assertions to discredit the entire concept. For example photographic alteration which HAS happened, DOES happen and is an established part of intel work and the lapdog media has become a "UFO nut" type joke now due to his overegging of the pudding alleging pretty much NO photograph is genuine or unaltered.
I now treat Fetzer as an ONI asset whose function is twofold:
1. detect otherwise silent or unfound researchers, who naively come forward to him - with disastrous results
2. whatever he discredits has an element of truth to it or he wouldn't go after it.
For example now he's latched on to Apollo - it makes me more sure than ever that although the Moon has been visited the photographic record of those vists is faked, BUT not in the ways he alleges. What he advances is always flawed and always one or more "kill switches" in it.
Like the bad witnesses in the Shaw trial - they tend to lead a large number of open minded people to conclude "one bad - all bad." Which is simply not the case.
Life's more complicated than that.