The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer

[David Josephs]

Doesn't a nuclear explosion leave radioactivity?


Wouldn't a nuclear explosion at the bedrock base of the Tower have kinetically collapsed the building at that point? And doesn't this contradict the planted demolition charges theory?

We must keep in mind that we can only speculate about what kind of high-tech weapons the Pentagon and others have available to them today. Stuff that may sound like science fiction, but might be made public only 20 years from now.

Which doesn't really answer the point that such a device, if set off at the bedrock level, would have collapsed the towers from the base and not the upper areas as was seen.

I realize this is a WTF happened to Fetz thread and we all enjoy the 50+ year old ongoing conspiracy more than the 15 year old one which can trace its roots back thru that day in Nov.

As absurd as the Silly Bullet Theory our government wants us to once again suspend the laws of physics and believe what you're told - not your lying eyes and intelligence

Albert -

What we see/hear is
1) explosions
2) the heat travels thru the steel skeleton and along with cutting charges on the core and secondary columns removes the 90,000 tons of building below the "impact" floors.
3) the water in the concrete vaporizes as explosions shoot material hundreds of feet into the air and horizontally - instead of a pile of rubble 30 stories tall looking like a pancake stack, 1/3 of the material from the buildings vaporizes with the remaining material reduced to dust...
4) the building falls with no resistence from its skeleton at free fall speeds - THIS IS NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE IN ANY REALITY ON ANY PLANE OF EXISTENCE
5) the heat from these explosions keeps "ground zero" smoldering for months in a non oxygen environment - NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE WITHOUT RADIATION
6) the many, many forms of cancer developed by those at ground zero are not possible due to the causes offered - while the USGov claimes the smoke and debris would not be sufficient to cause these cancers
7) elevated levels of radiation in the ground and surrounding areas of the Pentagon which the report claims is from the vaporization of the airplane



If you look carefully at WTC1's collapse you'll see the spire and roof (just like WTC7) begin to fall into the building before the building around it starts to implode.
This is the result of these massive core columns basically vaporizing leaving the "meat" of the bulding with nothing to hold it up.

I came across these the other day... I can't confirm if they were photoshopped as I know I can make a missle look like this easily.

What I can say for sure is no 757 hit the pentagon






So a 757 hit the side of this building?