14-02-2016, 09:47 PM
Jim,
I gather you've lost interest in this presentation, or you're too busy attending to the further discrediting of the irrelevant, elderly Fetzer.
I commented on this same subject matter in a recent thread about Joan Mellen's research and authorship.:
I do not know what to make of you, lately. I looked to you initially, in this thread, to assist in analyzing the new information I was finding that conflict with the existing and long held consensus.
BTW, I am the sole unique source of the research that influenced John Armstrong and Jim Hargrove to submit this "revision" to you, or to your webmaster, and as you can see, it is published on your site, attributed to the "work" of John Armstrong.:
http://www.ctka.net/2016/ArmstrongMailOr...rders.html
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8069&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8069&stc=1)
Kindly take it down, the portion of the page in the screenshot above consists entirely of two images I selected and presented, and my exact, unique
research details in the text directly above and below the two images. First I was ignored, then attempts were made to discredit both me and my research details, and then my unique research was appropriated and credited to the individual I proved was presenting inaccurate conclusions.
Left positioned image displayed in screenshot above - see left positioned thumbnail image at bottom of my November 11, 2015 post at this link.:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...post104479
Right positioned image displayed in screenshot above - see first image in my article dated November 10, 2015, revised November 19, 2015:
http://jfk.education/node/11
You are a researcher and an author, Jim. Display some empathy, please, regardless of your personal opinion.
I gather you've lost interest in this presentation, or you're too busy attending to the further discrediting of the irrelevant, elderly Fetzer.
I commented on this same subject matter in a recent thread about Joan Mellen's research and authorship.:
Quote:https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...post107118
........
From Donald H Carpenter's 2013 book, March 2, 1967 letter, David Baldwin to Clay Shaw.:
Quote: Garrison happens to be married to my godchild and first cousin....
(Link to supporting footnote)
Quote:….Garrison included in his six page complaint letter to the FCC chairman, published in
the June 18 Times-Picayune;
http://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?...d=176&tab=page
2of2 Garrison 06/67 letter to FCC comm. Rosel H. Hyde
(Top of right side column)
…It should be added that the last described endeavor has been accomplished not by members of the station (WDSU) itself, but by an attorney closely connected with the station who has previously been known to disperse funds in the New Orleans area in behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency….
I do not know what to make of you, lately. I looked to you initially, in this thread, to assist in analyzing the new information I was finding that conflict with the existing and long held consensus.
BTW, I am the sole unique source of the research that influenced John Armstrong and Jim Hargrove to submit this "revision" to you, or to your webmaster, and as you can see, it is published on your site, attributed to the "work" of John Armstrong.:
http://www.ctka.net/2016/ArmstrongMailOr...rders.html
Kindly take it down, the portion of the page in the screenshot above consists entirely of two images I selected and presented, and my exact, unique
research details in the text directly above and below the two images. First I was ignored, then attempts were made to discredit both me and my research details, and then my unique research was appropriated and credited to the individual I proved was presenting inaccurate conclusions.
Left positioned image displayed in screenshot above - see left positioned thumbnail image at bottom of my November 11, 2015 post at this link.:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...post104479
Right positioned image displayed in screenshot above - see first image in my article dated November 10, 2015, revised November 19, 2015:
http://jfk.education/node/11
You are a researcher and an author, Jim. Display some empathy, please, regardless of your personal opinion.
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.