"What Happened to JFK--and Why it Matters Today"

[Charles Drago]

Apart from Joannides wearing what appears to be a wig at the Ambassador, I am unaware of any claims that any of these persons were disguising their appearance. That does not appear to be the case for any of the "tramps" and it does not appear to be the case for any of the "familiar faces" in Dealey Plaza. If there is a basis for this suggestion, Charles, I would like to learn more about it.

One quick reference: According to Marjorie Hunter, writing in "Colson Confirms Backing Kennedy Inquiry but Denies Knowing of Hunt's CIA Aid," New York Times (June 30, 1973), p. 15, Hunt had been sent by Colson to New England to find dirt on EMK. For that project, he may have made use of disguises developed by the CIA.

I'll find other, more direct references to Dealey Plaza. But if we agree that the "tramps" were in fact conspirators, then by definition they are disguised as tramps.

And if you argue that Hunt is the old tramp, then is it not logical to assume that the appearance of relatively advanced age and the disparity between the "tramp's" ears and those of Hunt are functions of advanced disguises?

And if Hunt did wear sophisticated disguises during his EMK dirt digging, then is it farfetched to conclude that he had made use of similar techniques during previous operations?

For now,

Charles