24-12-2009, 03:25 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Ms. Gibson is very convincing. Her skills are undisputed.
Wrong.
I find her work wholly unconvincing because I dispute the very validity of her method absent positive results from controlled testing.
Again: Take the skull of a known, photographed individual who is not known to Gibson. Give it to Gibson and let her do her thing. Compare what she comes up with to the test subject's photos.
Until then, what you've got is nothing but fine art.