21-01-2010, 02:34 PM
Jack White Wrote:A false assumption is being made in my opinion that the plotters assumed beforehand that 45 years later a massive army of
citizen researchers would be examining their every effort.
So it is a mistake I think to assume that they were prescient enough
to plan forks in the road for future generations. They were just
trying to avoid being caught in the present...the future be damned.
Jack
Jack,
The plot must not be appreciated as an historical aberration -- a one-off, if you will.
Nor must the plotters -- at the Sponsor level to be sure, and with certain players at the Facilitator level -- be underestimated for their grasps of history and psychology.
If you maintain that the "forks in the road" as they exist today are the products merely of random motion, then by definition you subscribe to the grandest of coincidence theories.
If you maintain that JFK was the sole target of the Sponsors, I respectfully submit that you've failed to understand the basic nature of the ancient conflict in which JFK was the most notable 20th century casualty.
Again, this war has been waged since the Crucifixion -- at least.
The system that killed JFK is a self-correcting system. His removal was anything but a coup d'etat -- a blow against the state. Rather, it was an official act committed by the meta-state -- an act of self-defense.
It was as much an act of a war-of-choice as was the invasion of Iraq.
And the similarities don't end there.
It has always been about preservation of the lie. Or, if you prefer, the illusion of democratic choice and self-determination.
JFK's killers -- again, at the Sponsor level -- were never the slightest bit concerned about getting caught. They were and are beyond the reach of justice. Their creation and manipulation of false sponsors, doppelgangers, etc. was in service not to their own immediate/short-term safety and security, but rather to the very long-term preservation of the extant system of control of the many by the few.
The lie.
Only the likes of a JFK could threaten them.
And the threat he posed was as much spiritual in nature as it was political/material.
Charles
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene