The "Red Queen" and "The White Knight" and MKULTRA

[John Bevilaqua]

The film"The King of Hearts" was a cult classic in Central Square Cambridge, not Harvard Square, in the late sixties. I saw it more than once, it played for at least a year. Wonderful story.

I agree, one thing about the bastards is that they have a very sick sense of humor.

I have no doubt that some of them read these pages and laugh.
On other forums they post. We aim to be more careful here.

Dawn

Not that where it was shown is very important at all but it was made in 1966 and first debuted at the Brattle Square Cinema sometime in that first year and played at the Sack Cinema Chain in Boston and in dozens of other cities and at a few different theaters in Cambridge apparently. My guess is that the Brattle Square had the exclusive Cambridge rights for a year or two then it was shown elsewhere in other theatres.

I am just wondering if the choice of Lee Harvey (Oswald) as the lightning rod in the JFK conundrum was as a direct result of the choice of (Lawrence) "Lee" Harvey in the movie the Manchurian Candidate.

Or if the choice of Tim McVeigh as the right wing OK bomber was done as payback for all the years of anti-right wing postings done by the other Tim McVay from Canada who posted on Nizkor.org Just a thought.

I am very careful in posting both my citations, my reasoning and the justifications for including anyone in my list of possible or probable suspects in the JFK conundrum. And I make it perfectly clear who paid them, what motivated them and who supported them and why they participated in their various roles in the JFK hit. If my conclusions about the roles of various persons and the organizations supporting them does not seem to agree with conclusions reached by others then that is the point where honest counter arguments should be voiced.

Or when some opinions have been reached about a person like Gerry Patrick Hemming for instance using a more arm-chair approach or a more remote approach using 3rd party citations rather than using a combination of personal observations and personal interactions or an actual experiences approach, then the conclusions have to be weighted accordingly. I stand on my conclusions based on the result of Noel Twyman's interview of Hemming and what Twyman reported in his book and to me personally.

It is not always easy to connect the dots from the shooters, through their funders and their sponsors and then through the Oswald Legend builders, through the JFK Character Assassins at Operation Red Cross, and through the plot masterminds and string pullers who actually carried out certain aspects of the plot cover-up after the fact.

And I will always react and respond whenever someone criticizes the work of people like George Michael Evica, Bill Turner, Mae Brussel, Richard Condon, Jon and Scott Anderson, Russ Bellant, Bruce Cumings, Dick Russell and John Stephan or myself and some others when in fact on almost all of the core aspects of the JFK plot, we have all developed independent threads and leads and independent conclusions which are entirely self-corroborating and internally consistent.

And if and when I have to point out flaws in other themes and other lines of research which turn things into a cocked hat for a while, that is actually a good thing for the quality of the overall results in this case. For instance when one realizes that Guy Banister was neither ONI nor CIA but a loose cannon who was once an FBI agent like William Harvey his boss at the FBI, then you can draw the attention to his roles with the JBS, HUAC, LUAC, WACL, Citizens Councils, SISS, the Miss Sov Comm, INCA and people like Medford B. Evans, Elmore Greaves, Ned Touchstone, Leander Periz and Senator James O. Eastland from Mississippi, instead which narrows the focus down to only a small group of elected or appointed people with proper attribution to the correct US Government Bodies or Agencies where they were employed at the time of the assassination. Then the core membership of the JFK plot starts to look more like the assassination of Julius Caesar by a small group of like-minded disaffected radical Senators rather than some of the wide-ranging and vast alternatives proposed by some others.

The very fact that persons like Edwin A. Walker, Leander Perez, Wickliffe Draper, Robert Morris, Charles Willoughby, Medford B. Evans, Willis Carto, GLK Smith, Robert Welch and Guy Banister are almost always deliberately ignored by most JFK researchers just makes me question even more why this has played out in exactly that fashion. And it makes me even more determined to set the record straight on these guys.

And certainly whenever the words misinformation or disinformation are used to characterize my carefully researched and meticulously constructed, well documented research, then I certainly will take umbrage at those accusations and respond accordingly.

There are many forces at work here: Edmund Bernays styled Propaganda campaigns, PsyOps run by Robert Morris, Charles Willoughby, Medford B. Evans, Revilo Oliver, GLK Smith and even James Angleton, Public Relations scams and Brainwashing by Edward Hunter and many other facets of deliberate distortion of the facts.

It is very striking to me that these campaigns run by the list of people above all originated from within those in The John Birch Society who ran both the JFK plot AND the JFK cover-up and yet no one seems to see these obvious contradictions and to discuss WHY this makes them even more obvious candidates for culpability than they were absent this finger pointing and deflection of patently obvious guilt. And people also forget that The John Birch Society was the FIRST and MOST OBVIOUS suspect by everyone from the LEFT and the CENTER right after the assassination. The roles of SMOM and SKOM, WACL and The Pioneer Fund are very recent themes only developed in the last 15 years or so and for some reason people can not move away from their other focus to analyze these groups especially SKOM
which is LOADED with both Pioneer Fund Eugenicists, White Supremacists, Racists and INTERNATIONAL representatives of groups with reach far beyond mere domestic US politics.

And there are only a handful of people alive today who might still be able to manage a laugh about some of the many misdirected accusations cited on all these forums. That is, assuming they even bother to read these forums. The rest are either long dead and gone or on their way out.