21-01-2011, 05:24 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Jack,
I couldn't agree with you less.
Of such differences are allies made!
The precarious Cold War nuclear balancing act -- accent on "act" -- could not be risked by permitting a relatively low level assassination conspiracy against a major head of state to proceed.
The true Sponsors of JFK's murder, I submit, were those international powers who were, in George Michael Evica's phrase, "above Cold War differences."
The failure to retaliate against False Sponsor Fidel speaks to the control required to keep the conspiracy's consequences in check.
The breadth and depth of the conspiracy -- its design -- point to a controlling human initiator -- one or more, I'd concede.
What happened in Dallas was not the equivalent of "Hey, I've got some boards, you've got some curtains, let's put on a play."
It was a major production, with backers, a director (or two), a playwrite, and a cast.
Charles
Then we must disagree. The plot essentially was DOMESTIC, but
had international aspects because the MAJOR SPONSORS, as you
call them, had INTERNATIONALIST TIES in banking, thinking,
militarism, manufacturing, natural resources...one worldism.
If you name THE NEW WORLD ORDER as your principal sponsor,
we might be getting somewhere. But the conspirators were
domestic enemies of JFK. If you concentrate on founding of the
UN and those who advocated it, then you are on the right track.
GLOBALISM and a NEW WORLD ORDER were the principal tenets
of the sponsors and conspirators.
Jack