22-01-2011, 03:03 PM
Thank you, Charles.
And, in my Constitutionally protected opinion, you are dead on with the constructs of the Kennedy murder.
Here is a section of "JFK and the Unspeakable" that caused me to stop and read twice:
His job was go into underdeveloped countries and sweet talk the leadership to take on an enormous amount of development loans, loans given to them under fraudulent terms, loans they could never hope to re-pay. At that point, if you'll forgive my language, these countries became the United States' little bitch, and were, in effect, owned.
As part of the negotiations Perkins was authorized to offer these leaders bribes, making them very wealthy men. Of course their country would be crippled, their resources stripped, and their poor would suffer, but the poor have no humanity when it comes to profit margin according to these people.
And, if the leadership failed to respond to the proposal and the bribes? Perkins says his job of negotiation was over and they sent the "jackals" in to assassinate them.
They sent the jackals in to get rid of John Kennedy. This murder just happened to be on domestic soil. Not the first and not the last. Getting rid of leaders that don't cooperate is all part of the business model. And, more than any specific thing that JFK did during his brief presidency (like Vietnam or the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty), he was fucking with this business model and the ownership of the United States. He had to go.
To speculate furthur, all this took to begin was one brief conversation between David Rockefeller and Allen Dulles. On to Helms and Angleton and the whole thing swings into technicolor motion.
Of course, I'm always open to "or maybe not."
And, in my Constitutionally protected opinion, you are dead on with the constructs of the Kennedy murder.
Here is a section of "JFK and the Unspeakable" that caused me to stop and read twice:
Quote:In 1955, Air Force Headquarters ordered Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty, a career Army and Air Force officer since WW II, to set up a Pentagon office to provided military support for the clandestine operations of the CIA. Thus Prouty became director of the Pentagon's "Focal Point Office for the CIA."I've listened to John Perkins, the author of "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" speak on several occasions. He tells the story of working as a representative of World Bank and USAID through Chas. T. Main in Boston.
CIA Director Allen Dulles was its actual creator. In the fifites, Dulles needed military support for his covert campaigns to undermind opposing nations in the Cold War. Moreover, Dulles wanted subterranean secrecy and autonomy for his projects, even from the members of his own government. Prouty's job was to provide Pentagon support and deep cover for the CIA beneath the different branches of Washington's bureaucracy. Dulles dictated the method Prouty was to follow.
"I want a focal point," Dulles said. "I want an office that's cleared to do what we have to have done, an office that knows us very, very well and then an office that has access to a system in the Pentagon. But the system will not be aware of what initiated the request - they'll think it came from the Secretary of Defense. The won't realize it came from the Director of Central Intelligence."
Dulles got Prouty to create a network of subordinate focal point offices throughout, then throughout the U.S. government. Each office that Prouty set up was put under a "cleared" CIA employee. That person took orders directly from the CIA but functioned under the cover of his particular office and branch of government. Such "breeding," Prouty said decades later in an interview, resulted in a web of covert CIA representatives "in the State Department, in the FAA, in the Customs Service, in the Treasury, in the FBI and all around through the government - up in the White House...Then we began to assign people there who, those agencies thought, were from the Defense Department. But they actually were people that we put there from the CIA."
His job was go into underdeveloped countries and sweet talk the leadership to take on an enormous amount of development loans, loans given to them under fraudulent terms, loans they could never hope to re-pay. At that point, if you'll forgive my language, these countries became the United States' little bitch, and were, in effect, owned.
As part of the negotiations Perkins was authorized to offer these leaders bribes, making them very wealthy men. Of course their country would be crippled, their resources stripped, and their poor would suffer, but the poor have no humanity when it comes to profit margin according to these people.
And, if the leadership failed to respond to the proposal and the bribes? Perkins says his job of negotiation was over and they sent the "jackals" in to assassinate them.
They sent the jackals in to get rid of John Kennedy. This murder just happened to be on domestic soil. Not the first and not the last. Getting rid of leaders that don't cooperate is all part of the business model. And, more than any specific thing that JFK did during his brief presidency (like Vietnam or the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty), he was fucking with this business model and the ownership of the United States. He had to go.
To speculate furthur, all this took to begin was one brief conversation between David Rockefeller and Allen Dulles. On to Helms and Angleton and the whole thing swings into technicolor motion.
Of course, I'm always open to "or maybe not."