22-01-2011, 07:29 PM
Jack White Wrote:Caution is the best policy. These Deep Political guys are not fools. They cover their tracks well, leaving few clues for us to sniff.
I will agree with you that they make GREAT USE of FALSE SPONSORS.
I call them patsies or fall guys...something to lead us on false trails.
Oswald was one. Castro was one. Kruschev was one, etc.
I disagree that LBJ was one. He was one of THEM, not a patsy.
However, ANY dead guy can safely be named as a patsy...since he is
no longer around to dispute his patsyhood. So, in a sense, it is SAFE
to make a dead guy a false sponsor. Just not during his lifetime.
Jack
Think Third Alternative here, Jack.
Q. Was LBJ a False Sponsor or a Facilitator?
A. Yes.
And as we all know, many individuals and groups were given False Sponsor status during their lifetimes/in the immediate aftermath of the attack: LBJ, Castro, Khrushchev, anti-Castro Cubans, the Mob, Big Oil, for examples.
NONE of them were true Sponsors.
ALL of them were Facilitators
EDIT: In the next post below, Jan Klimkowski points out my glaring error in assigning Facilitator status to Castro and Khrushchev. I wish to correct myself here and to thank Jan for his due diligence. CD
Charles