28-03-2011, 09:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 28-03-2011, 01:21 PM by Seamus Coogan.)
Well lads as I'm set to do a review of Farrells 'LBJ and the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy' hence my not being in touch with you CD (aka our sponsors conversation-we'll sort out an interview or three when I get time).
Farrell's book owes it's existence to Craig Zirbel yes the 'Zirbelmeister' himself.
The attempts to nullify or subdue Dulle's probable role in the conspiracy to kill Kennedy is one of the most obvious things I have seen in recent times. Most researchers place Dulles there or there about's in the nexus. Farrell does give Dulles some air time. But he then has Hoover and Johnson creating the Warren Commission (Gerald McKnight and Don Gibson where are you?) and so on.
According to Farrell Johnson was talking into a CB throughout his entire journey through Dealey Plaza. This is complete and utter BS Jim D and I nailed Jones on!
Only the most basic of intellects could put Johnson anywhere near Dulles probable level of involvement. I think how the disinfo plan is panning out is that below average researchers are being manipulated by others to write and or promote the topic. Very few of the authors themselves seem to be 'plants' but CD as Jim and I have encountered with Hankey, it's the well meaning but deluded Paul Kangas like 'Conspiracy nuts' that are our greatest enemies.
I don't think Kangas who led Hankey down the path of doom is particularly 'well meaning' nor Bug or McAdams. I put them all in the same boat. With the latter being more preferable because at least from time to time they get stuff right! Paul Kangas ain't on my team.
In Farrell's chapter on mysterious deaths. He makes no mention of George DeM. There's no index and there's no mention what so ever of the Paines in the entire book. That's the quality of the latest wash of Johnson did it bollocks! Well no! However, Farrell doesn't quite buy into the body alteration angle and seems a bit less keen on entertaining every banal suspicion of the case than other authors who advocate Johnson rubbish. He also questions Browns famous party story. Which is also another one out of the box. Most Johnson devotees salivate all over her.
It'll make for an interesting review.
But it's also a worthy and fascinating discussion. As for sponsors and so fourth I feel extremely unconfident going above Dulles generally and that's with people like you and Jim heading in similar directions. Not because he was the most powerful man in the world but he seems like a good conduit for it all as Prouty and others have written.
Dulles childhood and family are an extremely mysterious bunch. Who with no real wealth in comparison to others of the time they commanded important positions within the US hierarchy since the Civil War (well before Rockefeller made his mark) knowledge is power and underneath his families 'missionary' status I have suspected they were amongst the United States early spy efforts (evidence is scant in this regard hence I won't go to the bank completely on what I say here least of all Jim and I have decided to call Dulles family something of a black hole).
There's something holding myself back from this Rockefeller chief sponsor kind of thing. Tacit support from some quarter I can definitely see! But for myself I think people like Dulles and Helms and others in the agency were ideologically driven Zealots. I don't think they needed the Rockefeller okay but I certainly don't think they would have shunned their support. I just think the lads were on go anyhow. Irregardless of Wall Street of which they were the servants of yet not slaves too.
Farrell's book owes it's existence to Craig Zirbel yes the 'Zirbelmeister' himself.
The attempts to nullify or subdue Dulle's probable role in the conspiracy to kill Kennedy is one of the most obvious things I have seen in recent times. Most researchers place Dulles there or there about's in the nexus. Farrell does give Dulles some air time. But he then has Hoover and Johnson creating the Warren Commission (Gerald McKnight and Don Gibson where are you?) and so on.
According to Farrell Johnson was talking into a CB throughout his entire journey through Dealey Plaza. This is complete and utter BS Jim D and I nailed Jones on!
Only the most basic of intellects could put Johnson anywhere near Dulles probable level of involvement. I think how the disinfo plan is panning out is that below average researchers are being manipulated by others to write and or promote the topic. Very few of the authors themselves seem to be 'plants' but CD as Jim and I have encountered with Hankey, it's the well meaning but deluded Paul Kangas like 'Conspiracy nuts' that are our greatest enemies.
I don't think Kangas who led Hankey down the path of doom is particularly 'well meaning' nor Bug or McAdams. I put them all in the same boat. With the latter being more preferable because at least from time to time they get stuff right! Paul Kangas ain't on my team.
In Farrell's chapter on mysterious deaths. He makes no mention of George DeM. There's no index and there's no mention what so ever of the Paines in the entire book. That's the quality of the latest wash of Johnson did it bollocks! Well no! However, Farrell doesn't quite buy into the body alteration angle and seems a bit less keen on entertaining every banal suspicion of the case than other authors who advocate Johnson rubbish. He also questions Browns famous party story. Which is also another one out of the box. Most Johnson devotees salivate all over her.
It'll make for an interesting review.
But it's also a worthy and fascinating discussion. As for sponsors and so fourth I feel extremely unconfident going above Dulles generally and that's with people like you and Jim heading in similar directions. Not because he was the most powerful man in the world but he seems like a good conduit for it all as Prouty and others have written.
Dulles childhood and family are an extremely mysterious bunch. Who with no real wealth in comparison to others of the time they commanded important positions within the US hierarchy since the Civil War (well before Rockefeller made his mark) knowledge is power and underneath his families 'missionary' status I have suspected they were amongst the United States early spy efforts (evidence is scant in this regard hence I won't go to the bank completely on what I say here least of all Jim and I have decided to call Dulles family something of a black hole).
There's something holding myself back from this Rockefeller chief sponsor kind of thing. Tacit support from some quarter I can definitely see! But for myself I think people like Dulles and Helms and others in the agency were ideologically driven Zealots. I don't think they needed the Rockefeller okay but I certainly don't think they would have shunned their support. I just think the lads were on go anyhow. Irregardless of Wall Street of which they were the servants of yet not slaves too.