28-06-2011, 04:07 AM
Between the three studies I have cited -- "Seismic Proof: 9/11 was an inside job", "More Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11", and "New 9/11 Photos Released" -- there is more than enough proof to put your mindless meanderings to rest permanently. So spare us more of the same, Jeffrey. You are a baloney salesman and we aren't buying.
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Jim,
Kindly comment on my post. There are many researchers who see the destruction as a gravity driven collapse. Have you read the work at the 911 Free Forum? ROOSD is not an understanding unique to me. I didn't even come up with the acronym.
Let's discuss seismic data as means to prove whatever you are trying to prove.
What are you trying to prove? Don't seismic signals come from the earth shaking from heavy stuff falling on it... as happened on 9/11? What WAS all that data... lots of explosions?