9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job

[Kyle Burnett]

I read the "Seismic Proof" paper years ago, and it seems well reasoned to me. On the other hand, I've yet to see anything even vaguely resembling a solid argument for video fakery.

the plane allegedly a Boeing 767 -- is traveling at an aerodynamically impossible speed (as Pilots for 9/11 Truth has confirmed)

How are you suggesting this was confirmed?

impossible unless a 500,000 ton building poses no more resistance to the plane's trajectory than air!

Buildings are mostly air, as is the plane. Well there's a lot of jet fuel in the planes too, but that doesn't hold together much better than air. Furthermore, even a sold wall didn't slow down this plane done much:



Obviously a wall of mostly glass interspersed with steel beams would provide even less resistance.

The problem, however, is that hitting a target that is only 208' on a side is a very daunting task.

Plausibility Of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated By GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems addresses that issue well.