9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job

[Charles Drago]

WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE?

This is seemingly a huge problem with the whole "no plane" theory. Real people died on 9/11. There is no denying that. However, the passenger lists are actually supportive pieces of evidence to the idea of "no planes." The 4 planes all had low loads -- less than 200 people total were onboard, including the crew. It turns out that many of the names were employees of Boeing and other military contractors or were in the military itself. The government set up a compensation fund for families of the victims of 9/11. Each family would receive $2 million compensation. Only a small percentage of the families entitled to money came forward to collect! For one plane of 40 victims, only 6 families tried to claim the $2 million! Moreover, six of the alleged hijackers were seen after 9/11. One of them spoke in length with his father the next day. Another hijacker was interviewed on the BBC on 9/12! One must ask, "How can a pilot fly a plane into a building and do an interview on the BBC the next day?!"

Passenger lists

So what happened to the people? It would be fairly simple for CIA operatives or black ops NSA security to pick up the crews and the few actual passengers from the planes.

Hi Jim,

Good to see you hereabouts again. Hope all is quite well with you and yours, my friend.

The whole People Problem disturbs me greatly. I'm in a bit of a time crunch, so let me get to what for me is the nitty-gritty:

1. Have the passenger manifests been published?

2. If so, have all names been verified as those of living people on 9/11/01?

3. If so, have efforts been made to determine the true status of each? Dead? If so, when and how? Alive? If so, where? Would not one living "victim" blow the op?

4. Have all the victims' families been interviewed?

For starters?

These surely are imposing tasks, and I do not criticize anyone for not having accomplished them. But the People Problem seems to be a make-or-break point of the hologram hypothesis.

I'll close with this wholly unsupported speculation regarding the Pentagon and Pennsylvania ... how shall I refer to them? ... projectiles:

Might one or both -- regardless of whatever they were -- been taken down by a still-secret weapon that could have reduced them to tiny particles?

Or should I just beam the hell out of here?

Best,

Charles