Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job
#18
From Pilots:

Pilots For 9/11 Truth have calculated the Equivalent Airspeed for EA990 peak speed of .99 Mach at 22,000 feet as the equivalent dynamic effects of 425 knots at or near sea level. This airspeed is 65 knots over max operating for a 767, 85 knots less than the alleged United 175, and 5 knots less than the alleged American 11. Although it may be probable for the alleged American 11 to achieve such speed as 430 knots is only 5 knots over that of EA990 peak speed, It is impossible for the alleged United 175 to achieve the speeds reported by the NTSB using EA990 as a benchmark.

From John Lear's affidavit:

>>>>> D. The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a
>>>>> speed of 540 mph fails because:
>>>>>
>>>>> a. No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet
>>>>> above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity
>>>>> and parasite power which cubes with velocity.
>>>>>
>>>>> b. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept
>>>>> the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.

Plus Pilots new documentary, "9/11 Intercepted", confirms the impossible speed and that a plane at that altitude and speed would have been unmanageable in flight and come apart physically. It appears to me that you are playing games by wanting me to summarize these sources so you can trivialize them. That suggests to me that you are not a serious student of 9/11 but want to obfuscate the data. I suggest you consider the other proofs I have advanced as well, since you seen to be avoiding them like the plague for the sake of distracting a point that has already been proven.

Kyle Burnett Wrote:Jim, I've read the article and affidavit you linked previously, but didn't see anything in either which rightly substantiates their claims of impossible speed. Can you not single out anything from them as best substantiating the claim?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job - by James H. Fetzer - 28-06-2011, 11:04 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  NEW Proof of Controlled Demolition of WTC-7 Peter Lemkin 6 6,465 19-04-2020, 05:27 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Making things appear [that are not there] and disappear [that are] on video in real-time! Peter Lemkin 1 5,042 28-02-2018, 08:40 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Seismic Evidence of Controlled Demolition of WTC Towers [all three] Peter Lemkin 0 4,252 12-01-2018, 09:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked Lauren Johnson 8 16,665 10-06-2016, 08:12 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Dubai Hotel Fire Further Proof To Lie of Fires Bringing Down Steel-frame Buildings Peter Lemkin 4 6,919 01-01-2016, 06:21 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Methodical Deception - 911 Very Interesting Inside The Airline Persective Peter Lemkin 90 57,508 30-12-2015, 02:49 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,991 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Oklahoma City: Three bombs inside the building Christer Forslund 22 12,390 24-04-2015, 07:36 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Tarpley on 9/11 - a key video... Anthony Thorne 10 8,640 13-01-2014, 10:16 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Video and Websites on 9/11 Adele Edisen 8 7,236 30-01-2013, 04:46 AM
Last Post: Adele Edisen

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)