9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job

[Kyle Burnett]

Then why don't you contact Pilots for 9/11 Truth and tell them they have their heads where the Sun does not shine?

First off, I've no interest in resorting to such vulgar characterizations. Second, if I went around emailing everyone I saw making a poorly reasoned argument, I would have no time left to do anything else.

I know Rob Balsamo and have confidence in their competence. That is not true of you. Here's a link to their home page at http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

Considering the thinness of their ranks, that's a rather weak appeal to authority you are wielding in place of your inability to justify using EA990 as benchmark to determine the maximum equivalent airspeed for 767s.

I find it curious that you are not discussing John Lear's affidavit or "9/11 Intercepted", which both discuss this in some detail.

I am also struck that you have not address the impossible entry of the plane into the building

I did address the impossible entry claim in my first post in this thread, after asking you for clarification on your "impossible speed (as Pilots for 9/11 Truth has confirmed)" claim. However, when you only vaguely responded my question, and didn't even acknowledge example of a plane impacting a wall which I presented, I felt it best to addresses the points of contention one at a time. So, since that isn't working as you're unwilling to discuss the use of EA990 as a benchmark, is there any of the many claims you've presented which you are willing to discuss the details of? Or are you going to respond to whatever I say by slandering me as incompetent and disingenuous, and telling me to go "Fight with" those you have vested your faith in as revelers of your proclaimed proofs?