23-07-2011, 06:29 PM
William Kelly Wrote:I am not overly general, in fact Piper sent me a copy of his book and then called me after I read it, and I told him some Jewish/Isralie connections he didn't even know and used in later editions - ie. Alex Ziger, Oswald's closest friend in Minsk was Jewish and had worked for an American company in Argentina before moving to USSR. Piper does not evaluate the entire story, but like those who blame the Mafia or any other suspect, he only presents the evidence that supports his theory, which is wrong. It's the wrong approach and the wrong conclusion.
BK
I think what you are doing here is allowing the overarching premise that Piper only emphasized evidence that fit his theory to eliminate legitimate evidence Piper has uncovered. Whether Piper over-reached in his conclusions or not the material he uncovered is highly significant. While the Johnson and mafia material is very interesting the Mediterranean cabal material is much more significant - yet it seems to be totally dismissed under this overarching premise. When I see how other material is scrutinized by Assassination researchers this instance stands out as curiously lacking the same follow-through other material receives. Especially considering the inherent value of the material itself.
I believe Piper has legitimately isolated underground factors that are so inherently real and meaningful that they couldn't possibly have no affect on the conspiracy. I understand the purpose and value of the Evica structure and agree with it as an investigative tool. However it can be used as a means of excluding otherwise valid evidence. I think this could be illustrated by going over each point of evidence one by one to show where exactly they were "wrong"? You can only push the term 'wrong' so far into Piper's otherwise-correct facts.
