01-09-2011, 02:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2011, 04:25 PM by Charles Drago.)
I continue to be distressed by my friend Jim Fetzer's insistence that David Sanchez Morales, among other CIA assassination superstars, was captured on film at the Ambassador Hotel on the night RFK was murdered there by conspirators.
In this article, Jim asserts that, "[Noted intelligence and photo expert James] Richards provided me a photo of Morales, which looks exactly like the Morales-look-alike at the Ambassador. I don't even think it's a difficult call."
In this article Jim provides us with the full face portrait of Morales with which many of us have been familiar for years. To me and many others, this person bears not the slightest resemblance to the figure initially identified by Shane O'Sullivan in his RFK assassination book and video -- an identification from which O'Sullivan has backed off, by the way.
Jim, would you please post a copy of the Morales photo provided to you by James Richards? If possible, would you post a view of O'Sullivan's "Morales" next to it so that we can make our own calls?
And if the aforementioned photo is in fact the Richards image, then there's no special status to be inferred from the fact that he gifted you with something that is readily available from scores of public sources.
Thanks,
Charles
In this article, Jim asserts that, "[Noted intelligence and photo expert James] Richards provided me a photo of Morales, which looks exactly like the Morales-look-alike at the Ambassador. I don't even think it's a difficult call."
In this article Jim provides us with the full face portrait of Morales with which many of us have been familiar for years. To me and many others, this person bears not the slightest resemblance to the figure initially identified by Shane O'Sullivan in his RFK assassination book and video -- an identification from which O'Sullivan has backed off, by the way.
Jim, would you please post a copy of the Morales photo provided to you by James Richards? If possible, would you post a view of O'Sullivan's "Morales" next to it so that we can make our own calls?
And if the aforementioned photo is in fact the Richards image, then there's no special status to be inferred from the fact that he gifted you with something that is readily available from scores of public sources.
Thanks,
Charles