03-09-2011, 03:22 PM
Zach Robertson Wrote:It is quite possible and probable that a couple Movers were in Dallas on 11/22. These people would be there as Sponsors for the Cells. They would be on the ground with the operators to let them know the Op was real and there was equal risk. Morales would not have to be there at all, although all these people would trail back to him, as he was the Originator for the plot. [emphasis added by Drago]
Well reasoned -- especially the part I've highlighted. The "equal risk" business is very real; it first was referenced to me some years ago by an all-too-legitimate player at the operational level.
Your use of the terms "Sponsors" and "Movers" are, however, confusing. See below.
Zach Robertson Wrote:However, I do not think these Establishment-type people would be the driving force behind the assassination.
In the Evica-Drago conspiracy model -- Sponsors/Facilitators/Mechanics -- your "driving force" seems to equate with our Sponsors, while your "movers" equate with our Facilitators.
I cannot accept that Morales was, in your word, the "originator" of the plot insofar as that would place him on the Sponsor level -- a level which he never approached. The disruption of order brought about by the violent removal of a powerful head of state at a time of great Cold War tensions simply would not be allowed if the conspirators were not acting with the blessing of those at the highest levels of supranational power.
In short, you don't believe that an order to kill JFK was given, and I cannot imagine that JFK would have been killed as he was killed without just such an order.
Zach Robertson Wrote:Once it was clear there would be no invasion of Cuba, Movers with ties to SE Asia would ensure there would be a war in Vietnam. There was more money to be made there than in Cuba anyway.
Agreed -- if by "Movers" you mean, in Evica-Drago language, Facilitators.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene