09-01-2012, 02:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2012, 03:40 AM by Seamus Coogan.)
Dawn Meredith Wrote:I have long been troubled by the attacks on authors who trash the amazing amount of research that connects Bush to both the assassination of JFK and the CIA decades before Warren Commissoner Gerry Ford appointed him head of the Company. I personally know people who refuse to read Russ Baker's fine book based totally on Jim D's review. I have addressed this with Jim and still do not understand his attack. Same with John Hankey. I have not seen JFK 11 and it's literally been years since I saw the first video but I recall that there was much to recommend it. Sure there were flaws, some huge ones, like the sugestion that W had JFK Jr. killed based on where he was or was not that day. Or that it was a father son killing. (ie Poppy killed JFK and W killed JFK jr- that is shoddy journalism.)<br><br>
<br>
I do not believe Jim D. or Coogan to be disinformationists, nor do I believe JF to be such. Honest disagreements can and do exist. And huge egos. To the utter detriment of our cause.<br>
<br>
Dawn
<br>
Lol I have to disagree Dawn. The research on GWB has been very indepth at CTKA. Before I did Hankey mate, I really thought that GWB had a chance of being involved. Seriously, I only got into it too disprove the bogus idea of Hankeys that Prescott Bush was running the CIA. I effectively did that but as I got into it I realised how far gone even the Bush JR being involved was. As far as collossal ego's. Well that's unfair. I for a fact can admit fault, I can also admit I have been foolish or egotistical. Indeed I can also admit I get stuff wrong. So can Jim Di. Now, I do not think Mr Fetzer has any self reflection. So yeah, I truly think that Jim and I are no where near the Professors levels and it's a shame you view us like that. <br>
<br>
Nonetheless please take a look at the Bush stuff again when you get some time. Their really is a difference between reading theJFK material and going through the nuts and bolts taking notes as you well know being a lawyer. But yeah it's only way to really resolve and see where the issues are. <br>
<br>
But cheers for the comments. Your keeping us all honest as per usual. <br>
<br>
As for that lad Lemkin, he'll keep lol. I'm dying for a beer at the moment I wonder what he drinks?
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992