09-01-2012, 09:49 PM
This joke isn't funny any more. the whole thing with Professor Fetzer and his persistence with "LBJ mastermind" according to the gospels of Brown, Nelson, Bill Sol Estes, McClellan and E.H.Hunt reminds me of a hamster's wheel. We spin round and round and we are stuck in the same position, repeating the circle over and over again. We keep repeating ourselves so i won't bother to explain him again my disagreements. But to believe E.H.Hunt,it is something that he should not be proud of and i don't know why he refuses to see it.
I would like to think that his intentions are noble but unfortunately the results lead us to two disturbing conclusions:
1. He propagates the LBJ mastermind lie, so he is "helping" wittingly or unwittingly to cover up the true sponsors of the crime, so he plays their game
2. His persistence about the Z-film hoax increases the cognitive dissonance among researchers and as Charles have said "The enemy's goal is not to settle this argument, but to prolong it." so again wittingly or unwittingly serves their purpose. I would refer him to Salandria's words, like i said to Cinque 3 times, but he did not get it either.
who has mysteriously disappeared for good i hope.
As for Hankey his research is flawed and to compare his work and contribution with that of Jim DiEugenio was totaly wrong. I would suggest Hankey to read DiEugenio's book "The Assassinations", i am sure he will have a lot to learn from this book.
Regarding the Z-film i would refer him to my answer in another thread[URL="https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?9362-The-Danger-Of-The-Fetzer-Assassination-School&highlight=cinque"]
[/URL]https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...ght=cinque
I would like to think that his intentions are noble but unfortunately the results lead us to two disturbing conclusions:
1. He propagates the LBJ mastermind lie, so he is "helping" wittingly or unwittingly to cover up the true sponsors of the crime, so he plays their game
2. His persistence about the Z-film hoax increases the cognitive dissonance among researchers and as Charles have said "The enemy's goal is not to settle this argument, but to prolong it." so again wittingly or unwittingly serves their purpose. I would refer him to Salandria's words, like i said to Cinque 3 times, but he did not get it either.
who has mysteriously disappeared for good i hope.
As for Hankey his research is flawed and to compare his work and contribution with that of Jim DiEugenio was totaly wrong. I would suggest Hankey to read DiEugenio's book "The Assassinations", i am sure he will have a lot to learn from this book.
Regarding the Z-film i would refer him to my answer in another thread[URL="https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?9362-The-Danger-Of-The-Fetzer-Assassination-School&highlight=cinque"]
[/URL]https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...ght=cinque