14-01-2012, 08:41 PM
Greg Burnham Wrote:Charles,
I think that interpretation is possible, but improbable. However, even if we were to assume that Greer/Kellerman were doing what you suggest, the obvious question becomes why in the world was no protection on the street to begin with? Why were there potential threats allowed to be in a proximity enabling them to interfere with the client's escape route thus preventing it from being exploited? IOW: There is no innocent explanation for the "sequence" of events notwithstanding the potentially innocuous nature of some of its parts. I do not subscribe to any particular theory regarding those two on the street (TUM & TA), except to say they were not innocents. Having said that, their exact role is not something I care to speculate on at this juncture. I will say this, using either Rich's scenario or your's, their actions did effect the rate of travel of the client vehicle while in the kill zone, ergo, they were involved in some capacity by design.
We agree on the "no innocent explanation" argument.
We agree on the involvement "in some capacity" of Umbrella Man and The Cuban/White Windbreaker Man.
We agree that their actions resulted in the slowing down (and, I am convinced, stopping) of the limousine.
So we're clear, the scenario is "mine" only to the extent that I offered it here. It was not my intention to endorse it. My purpose in bringing it to our readers' attention is to illustrate that the submissions of interpretations of important aspects of this case that go against the conventional wisdom are important components of larger deep political studies of the meta-event.
Imagine what we could learn about the conspiracy if we could subject the film(s) viewed by you, Rich, and others to analyses using today's available technology and the expertise of the best minds in our community ...