Rich DellaRosa talks about the Other Zapruder film.

[Greg Burnham]

The "other" film (or films?) of the assassination was shown for reasons postulated previously on this thread -- reasons that make perfect sense.

Your disagreement is most welcome here. Out of argument (as opposed to quarrel) there often emerges truth. I'm eager to learn, and thus perhaps learn from, the roots of your problems with the aforementioned reasons.

A film that was viewed, in public and private by at least six individuals on multiple occasions proves (not indicates, but proves) that the warren commission lied, and that all sorts of organizations within the government conspired to murder the president. Had this been true, that at least six ( and probably hundreds, based on the statement by Rich's viewings ) viewed the film, and viewed it in different situations, demonstrates that many copies of this film existed, and many hundreds of people viewed it (the vast majority of whom have no idea that it was significant). Long before that point, in my opinion, the genie has left the bottle. It's not going back in. The copies of this film are not going to be contained. People with 'Trophy Room' films would not show them in theaters in manhattan and classrooms at a college. This isn't a 'banned movie'. This is evidence of a covert revolution. Possession of this film provides possessor with tremendous power. If there were that many copies, which it seems there were, and they were viewed by that many people, somebody would have leaked it by now - or much more likely - it would never have been paraded around and shown to people.

Putting the lid on that, again imo, would be exponentially harder than murdering some politicians, which seems pretty par for the course. People who were stupid enough to let that film be viewed publicly, apparent for about a decade, would not be competent enough to clean that mess up and get the genie back into the bottle.

So what is your alternative solution to this conundrum?