27-01-2012, 04:51 PM
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Researchers in the past focused on their faces. What we have
done is focus on their shirts, which transforms the situation.
Nonsense.
This attempt to take credit for an all-new line of inquiry flies in the face of long-standing, serious, publicly posed questions about and studies of the shirts. So there is no "transformation
here, and to claim otherwise is to be, kindly stated, disingenuous.
James H. Fetzer Wrote:(1) We PROVE that Doorway Man was wearing Oswald's shirt;
(2) We PROVE that Doorway Man was not wearing Lovelady's,
which was either checkered or vertically striped, where
( a ) He was not wearing Lovelady's checkered shirt;
( b ) He was not wearing Lovelady's striped shirt;
Therefore,
(3) Unless Lovelady was wearing Oswald's clothing,
the man in the doorway was Oswald. It's that simple.
Nonsense.
(1) All you have demonstrated is that Doorway Man is wearing a shirt that is all but identical to LHO's arrest shirt.
(3) Not "simple" so much as simple-minded, insofar as this "logic" is pitifully and blatantly uninformed by deep political insight and analysis.
What is the date and time and place of the earliest public presentation of Altgens 6 not in its cropped, no-doorway form, but in its entirety?
What is the time lag, if any, between public presentations of cropped and uncropped versions?
How does the Altgens 6 controversy fit into the long-established pattern of doppelganger phenomena in the JFK assassination and cover-up?
When will we learn to suspect/reject false A/B choices in this case and instead look for third alternatives?