TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[Albert Doyle]

Look, this has not really been an important issue with me until recently. I'm simply stunned at the way so many good people are figuratively shrieking "it IS Lovelady" in the doorway. It has certainly not been proven to be Lovelady. There is still a great deal of doubt, and I, for one, still strongly suspect the figure is Oswald.

Sorry, but to have such an opinion I feel one has to participate in the actual vetting of the evidence, as was done on Lancer. There's too many people who voice generalities like the above who then give credibility to Fetzer when that evidence has been more than reasonably disproven.

The color film frame of Lovelady standing off to the side shows him in the identical plaid shirt. This is the same shirt seen on Lovelady at the police station. Therefore the vertical striped shirt is irrelevant and doesn't have anything to do with anything. It was simply misremembered by Lovelady who wore the wrong shirt. I have no doubt Lovelady wore the right shirt in the posed shot because he saw pictures of himself wearing it and was reminded. More importantly the color film frame shows Lovelady with his shirt wide open exposing a white undershirt in an identical fashion to that seen on Doorway Man. What people who deal with this in a superficial manner don't realize is that technology could prove the blended color signature emitting from Lovelady's shirt in the color film frame could be identified by its individual color frequency. If Lovelady's shirt was analyzed in a similar manner from the posed shot it would also register the exact same color signature which is proof beyond a doubt that it was Lovelady. There's much more sophisticated arguments like these that would prove it's Loveday, yet some CTer's prefer to regress into lesser arguments. In my opinion, these people are worse than Lone Nutters.

It's Lovelady, there's no doubt about it and Dr Fetzer has zero credibility. I'd like Fetzer supporter's opinion on his claim about the USS Vincennes. It has to be pointed-out that Dr Fetzer conspicuously refuses to return to account for himself when totally disproven. How anyone could back him after this is bizarre to me.