28-01-2012, 06:56 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:You could not be more off-target.
The multiple shirt provocation -- and that's precisely what we're dealing with here: a provocation -- is served mightily by what you term Lovelady's innocent "misremembering" and what I and others see as a significant component in a larger, hostile operation to confuse and misdirect.
Again, the failure to learn the lessons of deep politics is dramatically illustrated here by the absence of doubt.
OK, sure. But don't you see it makes no difference either way. If Lovelady was somehow induced into bringing the wrong shirt for purposes of deliberate confusion it still doesn't have anything to do with the abstract proof of Doorway Man being Lovelady. I believe that can be proven by intelligent argument and analysis.
In the end the Lovelady issue is minor and secondary to the evidence behind the conspiracy. JFK was assassinated with the conscious cooperation of main government offices and agencies. I personally believe Lane's Mexico City arguments are good enough for an indictment to show Phillip's CIA office was consciously setting-up Lee Harvey Oswald as an Operation Northwoods-type patsy in a Seven Days In May coup. I think we have enough to act against the government at this point.