30-01-2012, 11:20 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:On Lancer Robin Unger introduced a clearer copy of Altgens from Marsh. It clearly shows a patch of neck skin in the blow-up of "Doorway Man" that is separate from the chin shadow. Because of this we can establish that the round neck T-shirt is separate and distinguishable from the V-shaped dark chin shadow that Fetzer and Cinque are mistaking for a "V-neck" T-shirt. Close analysis of Unger's Marsh scan will prove that Lovelady's round-neck T-shirt is visible on Doorway Man, as is a patch of lighter-colored skin which proves that the dark shadow seen as the V-shape is separate and distinguishable from that skin area proving beyond a doubt that they are two separate entities as the photo's film indicates. Unger is competent enough to detect that the V-shaped chin shadow is enhanced by the "over-contrast" evident in Altgens' photo and explains what Fetzer/Cinque are mistaking for a T-shirt neck opening.
This one case destroys Fetzer's theory and should put the issue to rest. Folks who want to continue to give this theory credibility can do so, but they do so at the expense of not recognizing this proof.
I agree with you mate but generally speaking Al, it's not just this. If we put together the evidence presented in your counters from Lancer alongside here. Not to mention additional comments and observations from Drago, Dragoo and even neutrals like GB and Adele. I think the case against Cinques argument is generally speaking pretty solid. I mean there's so many interesting things going on. Not just the shirt!
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992