09-02-2012, 09:26 AM
Jeffrey
Thank you for your detailed description of the core column end splices. I have searched in vain for a photograph or drawing depicting that precise condition. I picture the half-inch plates welded to the outer face of the columns, at any rate the disparity of that half inch thickness to the average of several inches for the box perimeter wall and the variable interior members presents a structural weakness.
Further, I found a site positing "weld planes" wherein the thirty-six foot long columns all spliced at the same level; which site listed some including "88, 92", showing photos with "explosions" or "smoke" at 88 and 92 of one of the towers, implying demolition charges at those locations.
Extricating myself from that hypothesis, it is a principle of construction to stagger joints to eliminate a plane of weaknessbut, and it's a four-crane-sized butconstruction required the "weld planes"it's where the four corner cranes sat to do the lifting and placing.
In the macroview, I eschew the Mossad ex Machina accusation which is knee-jerk with so many, many, many with whom I discuss the Big Coup of 1963. It is in my view vastly more logical that the same Saudi Arabian regime which has bought so many presidents, administrations, post-administration lobbyists, called in a hit on its inconvenient Hussein, the one in Baghdad.
Insert here my Iran-Gates-Brezinski perpetual motion hobby horse.
Whomever is to blame, the construction particulars of the casus belli are available in the multiresolution browser at
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence...rames.html
And to reference directly the charge of charges at 88 and 92:
http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/inde...osition=20
The pertinent paragraph being:
As mentioned at this link , all 47 core column splices are at the same elevations separated by 3 floors in the region of interest (they are not staggered). There are horizontal planes separated by 3 floors which contain all the splice connections. The floors are 89, 92, 95, 98, 101, 104. The splice locations are about 3 ft above the flooring. The splices in this region are all bolted with no welds.
In the above paragraph the author alleges "no welds" at 89, 92, 95, 98, 101, 104. I can see in photographs the "weld planes," that is, that the three-story columns splice at the same plane or level, but I don't see the source for the no-weld claim.
I would return to an earlier hypothesis, that Acme Contractors entered the appropriate spaces and placed minimal and surgical devices to initiate the consequent catastrophic failure following the airplane impacts.
The result was a couple of trillion-dollar decade-long wars, the cattle-car-ization of the nation vis-a-vis commercial travel, the ceding of all civil liberty (POTUS may now kill anyone), and no presumption of privacy nor fourth, fifth or sixth amendment rights.
Thank you for your detailed description of the core column end splices. I have searched in vain for a photograph or drawing depicting that precise condition. I picture the half-inch plates welded to the outer face of the columns, at any rate the disparity of that half inch thickness to the average of several inches for the box perimeter wall and the variable interior members presents a structural weakness.
Further, I found a site positing "weld planes" wherein the thirty-six foot long columns all spliced at the same level; which site listed some including "88, 92", showing photos with "explosions" or "smoke" at 88 and 92 of one of the towers, implying demolition charges at those locations.
Extricating myself from that hypothesis, it is a principle of construction to stagger joints to eliminate a plane of weaknessbut, and it's a four-crane-sized butconstruction required the "weld planes"it's where the four corner cranes sat to do the lifting and placing.
In the macroview, I eschew the Mossad ex Machina accusation which is knee-jerk with so many, many, many with whom I discuss the Big Coup of 1963. It is in my view vastly more logical that the same Saudi Arabian regime which has bought so many presidents, administrations, post-administration lobbyists, called in a hit on its inconvenient Hussein, the one in Baghdad.
Insert here my Iran-Gates-Brezinski perpetual motion hobby horse.
Whomever is to blame, the construction particulars of the casus belli are available in the multiresolution browser at
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence...rames.html
And to reference directly the charge of charges at 88 and 92:
http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/inde...osition=20
The pertinent paragraph being:
As mentioned at this link , all 47 core column splices are at the same elevations separated by 3 floors in the region of interest (they are not staggered). There are horizontal planes separated by 3 floors which contain all the splice connections. The floors are 89, 92, 95, 98, 101, 104. The splice locations are about 3 ft above the flooring. The splices in this region are all bolted with no welds.
In the above paragraph the author alleges "no welds" at 89, 92, 95, 98, 101, 104. I can see in photographs the "weld planes," that is, that the three-story columns splice at the same plane or level, but I don't see the source for the no-weld claim.
I would return to an earlier hypothesis, that Acme Contractors entered the appropriate spaces and placed minimal and surgical devices to initiate the consequent catastrophic failure following the airplane impacts.
The result was a couple of trillion-dollar decade-long wars, the cattle-car-ization of the nation vis-a-vis commercial travel, the ceding of all civil liberty (POTUS may now kill anyone), and no presumption of privacy nor fourth, fifth or sixth amendment rights.