TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[Albert Doyle]

You're the one who brought up the lintel, not me. I don't think it's lintel shade. But, it's definitely shade that is causing the slivers of darkness that you see on both sides of his t-shirt.

You are simply not dealing in reality my troll friend Dr Cinque. You live in a crazy world where you can say things like "it's definitely shade" but then not have to account for where exactly that undefined shade came from? Anyone with any intelligence or analytical ability would see that Lovelady is out in direct sunlight with nothing capable of making any shade. Dr Cinque in his demented wisdom once again offers retarded information as a deliberate form of obfuscation and avoiding the evidence. If we put it directly once again and ask our sick troll Dr Cinque to respectfully and intelligently answer for this next fatal gaffe we will be responded to with another offering of crazy run-arounds that don't make any sense. I'm wondering why the board allows Dr Cinque to continue doing this because I have seen people banned for much weaker violations.


If we forced Dr Cinque to answer for his failures we would find that the sliver he has now weaseled into a "shaded area" is the sunlit skin patch that it is and proves what I'm saying. Dr Cinque is simply playing a sick child's game by working this feature that he knows he can't recognize into a "shaded area" (in other words, the opposite of what it really is) because of his obvious awareness of this.


If you ask this sick troll Cinque to account for how this could possibly be a shaded area, as he claims, when the Altgens photo clearly shows Lovelady standing in open sunlight with nothing between him and the sun, he'll dodge this obvious proof and return with some more of his retarded renderings. Since basic logic, that Cinque refuses to recognize, dictates that the dark area seen as the "V" notch on Doorway Man must be the shade because the "sliver" area is lighter, that means the sliver area cannot be shade. But it can't be shade anyway because there's nothing to cause it. Nor can Cinque describe what would be shading it. Cinque is allowed to troll around this inescapable fact by speculating that it is shade, but he can't make any serious explanation for why it is shade or what is causing it. Thus Cinque is allowed to get away with offering a childish level of analysis that he isn't held responsible for according to the mainstream Kennedy Assassination claim he aspires to.



Cinque can't credibly explain what is causing the "shade" he claims for the skin patch in the Marsh scan.


Like Fetzer, Cinque simply refuses to answer the question about the difference in color between the V-shaped shade area under Lovelady's chin and this skin patch. It's obvious the reason he refuses to honestly answer this is because he's very well aware it destroys his theory. He can't account for why, if this skin patch shows sunlit skin, is the "V" area under Lovelady's chin black? If it isn't shade from Lovelady's chin then why isn't it light-colored like the skin patch area?


I don't think this board should allow Dr Cinque to continue this dishonest and deliberately-untruthful type of site conduct. He's being allowed to back up and unload his garbage truck into the thread in response to credible analysis. He's not held accountable for the deliberate-lie wrenches he's allowed to throw in to the machinery of truth with impunity.