05-02-2012, 05:33 AM
No, you are being stupid and ridiculous. The shadow is from his head in the same way as this picture of the other man, in which you see shade on his neck and on his trapezius muscle. It is not coming from chin. How could his chin shade his trapezius muscle?
And just look at this picture of Doorman. And keep in mind that it's much brighter than the one with the slivers. In this one, it isn't even debatable. You can clearly see that it's a vee-neck t-shirt.
Bernice, I'm asking you to step in. Please look at this picture of Doorman.
I want you to observe firstly that the fundamental vee nature of the shape of the opening is unassailable. Even if you were to assign. . . . (my God, it's hard for me to even say it because it's so stupid and ridiculous, but OK, I'll try). . . even if you were to assign some little sliver of what looks like t-shirt and say that it's sunlite skin. . . (there, I did it, pant, pant, pant) it would NOT change the fundamental vee shape of the t-shirt. The vee occurs at the notch. Get it, Doyle? And that's what I was trying to get through to you before, that you are fighting windmills here. The shirt comes to quite a point in the midline, a notch, and that is true irrespective of the slivers, which as you can see in this version are almost completely and totally inconsequential and close to non-existent. Even with the slivers in your corner, you don't have a round-neck t-shirt there. What you see there is a vee-neck t-shirt.
Now, I hope you are not going to be like your pal Duncan MacRae and start blowing it up and changing the lighting, etc. He got it to where the t-shirt opening was jagged and tooth-like. Ah, the wonders of science! I suppose you could manipulate it into just about anything you want. But, it is what it is, and the fact is that there is NO reason whatsoever to do ANYTHING to this picture, this very picture, the one that you see right here on the right. It shows the t-shrirt very well and ANYTHING you might do to it is just going to distort the reality. You want to change it because you don't like the reality. And, it's very childish of you, Albert.
And just look at this picture of Doorman. And keep in mind that it's much brighter than the one with the slivers. In this one, it isn't even debatable. You can clearly see that it's a vee-neck t-shirt.
Bernice, I'm asking you to step in. Please look at this picture of Doorman.
I want you to observe firstly that the fundamental vee nature of the shape of the opening is unassailable. Even if you were to assign. . . . (my God, it's hard for me to even say it because it's so stupid and ridiculous, but OK, I'll try). . . even if you were to assign some little sliver of what looks like t-shirt and say that it's sunlite skin. . . (there, I did it, pant, pant, pant) it would NOT change the fundamental vee shape of the t-shirt. The vee occurs at the notch. Get it, Doyle? And that's what I was trying to get through to you before, that you are fighting windmills here. The shirt comes to quite a point in the midline, a notch, and that is true irrespective of the slivers, which as you can see in this version are almost completely and totally inconsequential and close to non-existent. Even with the slivers in your corner, you don't have a round-neck t-shirt there. What you see there is a vee-neck t-shirt.
Now, I hope you are not going to be like your pal Duncan MacRae and start blowing it up and changing the lighting, etc. He got it to where the t-shirt opening was jagged and tooth-like. Ah, the wonders of science! I suppose you could manipulate it into just about anything you want. But, it is what it is, and the fact is that there is NO reason whatsoever to do ANYTHING to this picture, this very picture, the one that you see right here on the right. It shows the t-shrirt very well and ANYTHING you might do to it is just going to distort the reality. You want to change it because you don't like the reality. And, it's very childish of you, Albert.