06-02-2012, 07:01 AM
Don Jeffries Wrote:I didn't say Cinque and Fetzer had definitively solved anything. However, I think their arguments are as valid as the arguments against them. As I stated before, I didn't need Cinque's study to sway me, because I already suspected Oswald was the figure in the doorway.
Like I said originally, you can't deal with this in a superficial manner and then claim equal opinion, in my opinion. Their arguments were categorically disproven, no, destroyed, really. If you were following it, Dr Cinque was reduced to lying about a critical piece of evidence seen in the Marsh scan. That evidence proved what Fetzer and Cinque were claiming was Oswald's "V-neck" undershirt collar was actually the dark shadow coming off Lovelady's chin. If you were paying attention my arguments forced the person you are crediting with making valid arguments (whew!) into admitting it was a shadow from the chin, and then when he realized what it entailed he then tried to childishly claim it to be a V-neck as well. (It can't be both)
The only reason this particular party got this far with this theory in the first place is because there's too many main conspiracy research personalities who refrain from the nuts and bolts analyses required to disprove them, in my opinion. I participated in the "debate" with those two gentlemen. Do you realize they lost each and every point they made? The debate ended with Dr Cinque desperately trying to claim a non-existent buttoned flap on Lovelady's shirt.
"Valid arguments"???