12-02-2012, 08:54 PM
I think most assume that the conspirators whomever they were intended to completely destroy the entire WTC... all seven buildings. And that's what happened on 9/11.
My question is about trying to get into the head of the terrorist mind who planned the attack...whether state actors or non state terrorists.
The perps had some objective in carrying out the attack. What were they?
If the main pupose was to create the appearance of humiliation and strike a blow inside the USA at the symbols of hegemony the twin towers... why would the entire complex need to be destroyed? Wouldn't the purpose be acheived if the jets hit the towers and the fires burned and the towers were rendered unihabitable and likely unrenetable after that.
My guess is that the public would be completely freaked out... much as they were when the whole thing came down... but having two skyscrapers hit by commerical jets. There would be the same TSA rubbish... increased security... loss of rights and so forth... and likely an attack of whomever they State wanted to blame for it.
I don't think that a non state terrorist group would care if the towers came down or were rendered as burnt out scars on the skyline. Mission accomplished.
If taken the whole campus down wasn't a reasonable objective for the non state terrorist... why was it for the state sponsored act (SCAD)? Why would they have to destroy everything? What ELSE was acheived that simply slamming jet liners in the towers would not? I mention this because the truth movement asserts that the both the the twins and 7 were CDs and the intent was to completely destroy them... even that the planes were only an excuse. Some claim bombs exploded 4, 5 and 6. as well. The claim re 7 is that all sorts of sensitive material was inside and had to be destroyed. Does this make sense?
Just askin'
My question is about trying to get into the head of the terrorist mind who planned the attack...whether state actors or non state terrorists.
The perps had some objective in carrying out the attack. What were they?
If the main pupose was to create the appearance of humiliation and strike a blow inside the USA at the symbols of hegemony the twin towers... why would the entire complex need to be destroyed? Wouldn't the purpose be acheived if the jets hit the towers and the fires burned and the towers were rendered unihabitable and likely unrenetable after that.
My guess is that the public would be completely freaked out... much as they were when the whole thing came down... but having two skyscrapers hit by commerical jets. There would be the same TSA rubbish... increased security... loss of rights and so forth... and likely an attack of whomever they State wanted to blame for it.
I don't think that a non state terrorist group would care if the towers came down or were rendered as burnt out scars on the skyline. Mission accomplished.
If taken the whole campus down wasn't a reasonable objective for the non state terrorist... why was it for the state sponsored act (SCAD)? Why would they have to destroy everything? What ELSE was acheived that simply slamming jet liners in the towers would not? I mention this because the truth movement asserts that the both the the twins and 7 were CDs and the intent was to completely destroy them... even that the planes were only an excuse. Some claim bombs exploded 4, 5 and 6. as well. The claim re 7 is that all sorts of sensitive material was inside and had to be destroyed. Does this make sense?
Just askin'