13-02-2012, 03:04 AM
What evidence would have had to have been destroyed?
Let's suppose the following plot:
SOB's inside the gov decide the do a false flag. They want a war and they want to use fighting Islamic Terrorism as the pretext. So they set up some drones and fly them into the towers ... put out the hijacker cover story. Evrerything is the same bu the towers don't come down nor does bldg 7. The twins burn for days and are charred burn out unsafe monstrosities... blocks around them are cordoned off for months while the authorities assess the damage (and remove and plant evidence to suit).
The Islamists who had nothing to do with it issue press releases taking claim for the act and praising Allah for doing this to the great satan.
Congress declares war etc...
The Feds agree to pay for the dismantling of the towers... A big fight goes on about whether to rebuild them or not.. not one wants to fly on planes or work in high rises... Military enlistment skyrocket. The DHS is formed and away we go!
No towers fell.
Let's suppose the following plot:
SOB's inside the gov decide the do a false flag. They want a war and they want to use fighting Islamic Terrorism as the pretext. So they set up some drones and fly them into the towers ... put out the hijacker cover story. Evrerything is the same bu the towers don't come down nor does bldg 7. The twins burn for days and are charred burn out unsafe monstrosities... blocks around them are cordoned off for months while the authorities assess the damage (and remove and plant evidence to suit).
The Islamists who had nothing to do with it issue press releases taking claim for the act and praising Allah for doing this to the great satan.
Congress declares war etc...
The Feds agree to pay for the dismantling of the towers... A big fight goes on about whether to rebuild them or not.. not one wants to fly on planes or work in high rises... Military enlistment skyrocket. The DHS is formed and away we go!
No towers fell.