06-08-2012, 08:26 PM
Peter, which post do you think is unrelated? (I thought you had declared openly that you wouldn't ever bother to read my posts.)
In a simple response, Peter, everything is related. All information available to the review and vetting of source, cause and effect is not and cannot (in a world actively filled with many sources of information, misinformation and disinformation) be neatly categorized into a single thread. It's an active cosmos. Perhaps we ought to categorize all posts into two categories: wave, or particle. Then we can invite Prigogine, Jung, Pauli and others to join the forum.
It is interesting that you use the phrase "getting on your nerves" in the broader context of a thread, two events, and the introduction of large piles of implication about the weaponization of neuroscience. Indeed, the act of getting on one's nerves has been deeply energized by lots of interest, funding, and organization since the creation of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, since 1994 headquartered on Tabernacle Street in London (inside "City" boundaries). Given its long history of research into the effects of traumatization on the human nervous system, psyche, etc...., given the information recently circulated about the purposeful creation of chaos..., given the role of the British psychological warfare, the CIA (and others?) in the applied "wartime experience of psychological collapse, to create theories about how such conditions of breakdown could be induced, absent the terror of war. The result was a theory of mass brainwashing, involving group experience, that could be used to alter the values of individuals, and through that, induce, over time, changes in the axiomatic assumptions that govern society."
"Mass media were capable of reaching large numbers of people with programmed or controlled messages, which is key to the creation of ``controlled environments'' for brainwashing purposes. As Tavistock's researches showed, it was important that the victims of mass brainwashing not be aware that their environment was being controlled; there should thus be a vast number of sources for information, whose messages could be varied slightly, so as to mask the sense of external control. Where possible, the messages should be offered and reinforced through ``entertainments,'' which could be consumed, without apparent coercion, and with the victim perceiving himself as making a choice between various options and outlets."
I'll assume that your use of the phrase "getting on my nerves" was a personal colloquial expression that indicates a certain amount of personal frustration that stems perhaps from your inability to get your point across, or control the conversation.
In a simple response, Peter, everything is related. All information available to the review and vetting of source, cause and effect is not and cannot (in a world actively filled with many sources of information, misinformation and disinformation) be neatly categorized into a single thread. It's an active cosmos. Perhaps we ought to categorize all posts into two categories: wave, or particle. Then we can invite Prigogine, Jung, Pauli and others to join the forum.
It is interesting that you use the phrase "getting on your nerves" in the broader context of a thread, two events, and the introduction of large piles of implication about the weaponization of neuroscience. Indeed, the act of getting on one's nerves has been deeply energized by lots of interest, funding, and organization since the creation of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, since 1994 headquartered on Tabernacle Street in London (inside "City" boundaries). Given its long history of research into the effects of traumatization on the human nervous system, psyche, etc...., given the information recently circulated about the purposeful creation of chaos..., given the role of the British psychological warfare, the CIA (and others?) in the applied "wartime experience of psychological collapse, to create theories about how such conditions of breakdown could be induced, absent the terror of war. The result was a theory of mass brainwashing, involving group experience, that could be used to alter the values of individuals, and through that, induce, over time, changes in the axiomatic assumptions that govern society."
"Mass media were capable of reaching large numbers of people with programmed or controlled messages, which is key to the creation of ``controlled environments'' for brainwashing purposes. As Tavistock's researches showed, it was important that the victims of mass brainwashing not be aware that their environment was being controlled; there should thus be a vast number of sources for information, whose messages could be varied slightly, so as to mask the sense of external control. Where possible, the messages should be offered and reinforced through ``entertainments,'' which could be consumed, without apparent coercion, and with the victim perceiving himself as making a choice between various options and outlets."
I'll assume that your use of the phrase "getting on my nerves" was a personal colloquial expression that indicates a certain amount of personal frustration that stems perhaps from your inability to get your point across, or control the conversation.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"