24-08-2012, 10:56 AM
Some place LBJ at the center of an event in Dallas at approximately 12:30 pm Central Time Friday November 22, 1963.
For the ten reasons explored in the CTKA essay I believe these persons are limping along with a Copernican model of the cosmos.
Further I would add that assessments from George Michael Evica, L. Fletcher Prouty, Peter Dale Scott, Charles Robert Drago and others have compellingly posited a model of the world's human interplay as driven by supranational, suprapolitical, suprareligious elements.
Namely, power.
Further, this element has so driven events long before the Dallas act, and since that act to this day.
Case in point, Afghanistan as a heroin source and for other reasons than those stated.
The rolling wave toward regime change falsely dubbed an Arab Spring when it is likely not to do with democracy but a power play serving unspoken interests.
To the extent that the Johnson-did-it theory is pushed as obsession, it obviously supplants truth.
For, there's no way in hell this transitory blowhard who caved like a little girl in March 1968 and died January 1973 dared such an act, nor could have acted in South America on behalf of Rockefeller et al, nor in subsequent regions on behalf of power.
The correct designation of Johnson is false-sponsor/facilitator (witting or unwitting not determined).
A thousand points show Johnson did not "mastermind" that deed.
Correct placement of "that deed" in the constellation of power play removes any possibility.
Donald Gibson does much to indicate Dean Acheson in the origin of the commission. Johnson danced to the tune written by another.
His vulnerability was exploited by the prime facilitator (in service to sponsors unnamed).
Johnson could be counted upon to A) go along with the limited "investigation"; B) approve the desired war policy vis-a-vis Vietnam; C) vouchsafe the role and position of CIA.
For these and for other reasons Johnson was allowed to ascend to the presidency.
In my view Nixon threatened CIA with his desire to be the potentate of intelligence, hence was deposed by machinations devised by Helms and carried out by McCord, Barker, Hunt, Sturgis et al.
The next pitfall to avoid is naming CIA as sponsor.
Individuals in CIA are likely to have facilitated the act (as they had done in regime change and assassination worldwide before and after) but the agency did not officially do anything but fall in line to protect its rice bowl.
As did all the agencies as was the design, which included Angleton's WW III virus identified by John Newman, Oswald and the CIA 1995/2008.
It wasn't Lemnitzer-LeMay, though LeMay got himself to Bethesda to help enforce obedience to the coverup, as did Greer-Kellerman.
The cleansing of the LBJ myth is part of a better model for the world.
Currently the terrorism model replaces the Cold War model.
But as Nixon went to China with Henry to see Mao and Chou to flank the USSR, so, too, the triad foreseen by Blair-Orwell was enabled.
Russia fears China in Siberia. Russia and China woo Iran--as did Brzezinski-Gates in CFR 2004 "Iran: Time for a New Approach" canceling the Bush model of the Axis of Evil.
Putin didn't use polonium. Did Putin order it.
We know what happened to the one Chinese leader who opposed Strike Hard at Tiananmen--house arrest until death.
Soros says Obama and Romney, not much difference.
Someone is making decisions. But it isn't a POTUS, nor a VPOTUS, nor a temporary occupant of an Article II position.
How about a laugh with Ned Beatty about how the cow ate the cabbage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKkRDMil0...ure=relmfu
For the ten reasons explored in the CTKA essay I believe these persons are limping along with a Copernican model of the cosmos.
Further I would add that assessments from George Michael Evica, L. Fletcher Prouty, Peter Dale Scott, Charles Robert Drago and others have compellingly posited a model of the world's human interplay as driven by supranational, suprapolitical, suprareligious elements.
Namely, power.
Further, this element has so driven events long before the Dallas act, and since that act to this day.
Case in point, Afghanistan as a heroin source and for other reasons than those stated.
The rolling wave toward regime change falsely dubbed an Arab Spring when it is likely not to do with democracy but a power play serving unspoken interests.
To the extent that the Johnson-did-it theory is pushed as obsession, it obviously supplants truth.
For, there's no way in hell this transitory blowhard who caved like a little girl in March 1968 and died January 1973 dared such an act, nor could have acted in South America on behalf of Rockefeller et al, nor in subsequent regions on behalf of power.
The correct designation of Johnson is false-sponsor/facilitator (witting or unwitting not determined).
A thousand points show Johnson did not "mastermind" that deed.
Correct placement of "that deed" in the constellation of power play removes any possibility.
Donald Gibson does much to indicate Dean Acheson in the origin of the commission. Johnson danced to the tune written by another.
His vulnerability was exploited by the prime facilitator (in service to sponsors unnamed).
Johnson could be counted upon to A) go along with the limited "investigation"; B) approve the desired war policy vis-a-vis Vietnam; C) vouchsafe the role and position of CIA.
For these and for other reasons Johnson was allowed to ascend to the presidency.
In my view Nixon threatened CIA with his desire to be the potentate of intelligence, hence was deposed by machinations devised by Helms and carried out by McCord, Barker, Hunt, Sturgis et al.
The next pitfall to avoid is naming CIA as sponsor.
Individuals in CIA are likely to have facilitated the act (as they had done in regime change and assassination worldwide before and after) but the agency did not officially do anything but fall in line to protect its rice bowl.
As did all the agencies as was the design, which included Angleton's WW III virus identified by John Newman, Oswald and the CIA 1995/2008.
It wasn't Lemnitzer-LeMay, though LeMay got himself to Bethesda to help enforce obedience to the coverup, as did Greer-Kellerman.
The cleansing of the LBJ myth is part of a better model for the world.
Currently the terrorism model replaces the Cold War model.
But as Nixon went to China with Henry to see Mao and Chou to flank the USSR, so, too, the triad foreseen by Blair-Orwell was enabled.
Russia fears China in Siberia. Russia and China woo Iran--as did Brzezinski-Gates in CFR 2004 "Iran: Time for a New Approach" canceling the Bush model of the Axis of Evil.
Putin didn't use polonium. Did Putin order it.
We know what happened to the one Chinese leader who opposed Strike Hard at Tiananmen--house arrest until death.
Soros says Obama and Romney, not much difference.
Someone is making decisions. But it isn't a POTUS, nor a VPOTUS, nor a temporary occupant of an Article II position.
How about a laugh with Ned Beatty about how the cow ate the cabbage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKkRDMil0...ure=relmfu