11-09-2012, 12:54 PM
Bevilaqua and I clashed more than once on the EF. Then I found out he had posted some bizarre, totally distorted information about my fiction (he claimed I'd had "books" published, when in reality I've had one novel published) on this forum. Actually, he made me seem pretty important, and credited me as being "popular."
Bevilaqua has an immature, narrow view of the conspiracy that killed JFK. He buys into the left-right paradigm completely, and is sold on "right wing extremists" being the impetus for the assassination. He mentioned the John Birch Society, Liberty Lobby, General Walker, etc. as being the masterminds. I tried to point out to him that none of these groups or individuals had the power to pull something like that off, and they certainly haven't had the power, for nearly 50 years now, to continue the coverup.
I didn't realize he had written a book. I'm sure the thrust of his arguments will echo the generic "liberal" slant of his forum posts.
Bevilaqua has an immature, narrow view of the conspiracy that killed JFK. He buys into the left-right paradigm completely, and is sold on "right wing extremists" being the impetus for the assassination. He mentioned the John Birch Society, Liberty Lobby, General Walker, etc. as being the masterminds. I tried to point out to him that none of these groups or individuals had the power to pull something like that off, and they certainly haven't had the power, for nearly 50 years now, to continue the coverup.
I didn't realize he had written a book. I'm sure the thrust of his arguments will echo the generic "liberal" slant of his forum posts.