07-10-2012, 05:34 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Mark Stapleton Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:[quote=Charles Drago]Here's "Rago" opening the kimono:
"Yes I do think that Oswald was a 'patsy' and an assassin. He probably thought that he was the only assassin. I think he was a willing participant. I do not think that he knew about the other assassin
I can see someone new to the JFK case saying that. Maybe he was drunk.
I still think he makes some good posts.
At least you're stepping back from the "impressive researcher" description of "Rago" that you first offered.
So "Rago" presents lunatic ravings, but "he" get's a pass because "he's" a rookie?
Or "Rago" is a drunk, so only "his" sober posts should be taken seriously?
Stop it, Mark. You're aligning yourself with, at best, a fool -- if not an agent provocateur.
I'll be the judge of that. But your dislike for this person is clear and duly noted Charles. Let it go old chap.
Jim Phelps posts were, for me, the closest depiction of who killed JFK and why that I've yet seen. I think that's exactly what went down.