TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[James H. Fetzer]

Do you have any idea how irrational you are being in upholding a dogma proclaimed by Charles Drago, when the proof is in your face? How do you account for the missing shoulder? How do you account for Black Tie Man being in front of and behind Doorman at the same time? How do you account for the obfuscated face? How do you account for the profile of a black man obscuring Doorman's shirt? Are you willing to believe ANYTHING Drago dictates, so matter how powerful the proof against it? I am dumbfounded at the astonishing lack of willingness to come to grips with new evidence on a crucial aspect of this case. Yes, we all had reason to believe Lee was not on the 6th floor--but this is stunning, direct proof that he wasn't a shooter!

Since my post of yesterday, "JFK believe it or not: Oswald wasn't even a shooter!", has apparently been deleted, no doubt by a man who is obsessed with himself and has shown his true colors in suppressing the most important development in JFK research in the past decade -- not by demonstrating any flaw in our research, but by condemning it out of hand WITH NO JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER -- which shows that he has been a fraud and manipulator from the beginning. I pity this man, who seems to take sadistic pleasure in attacking those who have done more and better research than anything associated with his name. He is a complete disgrace and lacks the courage to confront ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE presented in articles like the one he has suppressed. He is despicable from head to toe! What a travesty.

Jim - your fantastical nonsense, and refusal to perform journalistic due diligence, has long been apparent in the non-JFK arena.

Your recycling of agent provocateur "Cinque"'s illiterate garbage in the JFK arena is merely a further sign of your intellectual decline.

Or betrayal.

The term "Conspiracy Theorist" is purposely designed to marginalise and delegitimise genuine investigative research which threatens the Powerful.

The phrase "Conspiracy Theorist" is itself the manifestation of a psyop.

Tragically, you have become MSM's perfect "Conspiracy Theorist", willing to promote whichever half-baked, nay entirely unbaked, phantasmagoric fancy flickers across your frontal lobe.

Then you defend the indefensible in pompous, verbose, endlessly tedious fashion.

Whilst Mockingbirds chirp: "Look I told you so, you can't trust a Conspiracy Theorist to get anything right."

Your behaviour has damaged the entire research community.

Wittingly, or unwittingly, you have served the Powerful.

You have helped not to expose the Truth, but to suppress it.

I'm done with your nonsense.


Oh lookee here - it's another false flag Cinque production: