02-12-2012, 04:34 AM
Greg, fascinated by your relating David Mantik yesterday:
David Mantik just told me yesterday that he enjoyed a very informative presentation in Dallas last week at the Lancer conference. Striking was the fact that the numerous witnesses out front on the steps corroberated each other's story with an extremely high degree of consistency--nearly 100%--which indicates truthfullness. And not even one single witness mentioned seeing Oswald out front during the shooting. Not even one.
The base image in question above presents as 1904 X 1435.
Upon examination of the allegations it appears the preponderance are in no way supportable by the indistinct Altgens6.
The daisy chain of if,then gets only so far as: there were two men in Dallas in long-sleeved shirts.
The End.
There's satisfactory evidence Lee was in the lunchroom, getting change, drinking a Coke, not on the stair, not in the nest.
If for no other reason than Gerald McKnight relates the Dallas parrafin test for Lee's cheek was confirmed by AEC's Oak Ridge Lab which also tested seven men who actually fired a Mannicher Carcano and all tested positive.
The man still had nitrates on his hands (which may have come from boxes, ink) yet he supposedly washed it off his cheek--so that paraffin didn't pull it.
The expert (?) Cunningham claimed the weapon was too tight to leave GSR but the seven men at Oak Ridge and anyone familiar with it told him he was smoking his socks.
Here's that McNote:
Breach of Trust p 422 note 83
Assassination researcher Harold Weisberg sued both the FBI and the AEC to gain disclosure of the results of the December-January Oak Ridge National Laboratory tests on the paraffin casts. He made no headway with the FBI, but the AEC's successor, the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA), anxious to avoid litigation, turned over the results to Weisberg in July 1981. The ERDA file can be found at the Weisberg Archive. The Commission turned to FBI firearms expert Cortlandt Cunningham, whose testimony was buried in Appendix X of the Warren Report under the rubric "Expert Testimony" to explain why Oswald's negative paraffin test on his right cheek was of no evidentiary value. Ignoring the results of the FBI's own authorized AEC tests on the rifle as well as Dr. Guinn's report to Gallagher, Cunningham testified that the chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tightly sealed that it prevented any blowback. It was Cunningham's professional opinion that given the construction of the weapon, "personally" he would not expect to find "any residues on a person's right cheek after firing" it. See WCR, 561
David Mantik just told me yesterday that he enjoyed a very informative presentation in Dallas last week at the Lancer conference. Striking was the fact that the numerous witnesses out front on the steps corroberated each other's story with an extremely high degree of consistency--nearly 100%--which indicates truthfullness. And not even one single witness mentioned seeing Oswald out front during the shooting. Not even one.
The base image in question above presents as 1904 X 1435.
Upon examination of the allegations it appears the preponderance are in no way supportable by the indistinct Altgens6.
The daisy chain of if,then gets only so far as: there were two men in Dallas in long-sleeved shirts.
The End.
There's satisfactory evidence Lee was in the lunchroom, getting change, drinking a Coke, not on the stair, not in the nest.
If for no other reason than Gerald McKnight relates the Dallas parrafin test for Lee's cheek was confirmed by AEC's Oak Ridge Lab which also tested seven men who actually fired a Mannicher Carcano and all tested positive.
The man still had nitrates on his hands (which may have come from boxes, ink) yet he supposedly washed it off his cheek--so that paraffin didn't pull it.
The expert (?) Cunningham claimed the weapon was too tight to leave GSR but the seven men at Oak Ridge and anyone familiar with it told him he was smoking his socks.
Here's that McNote:
Breach of Trust p 422 note 83
Assassination researcher Harold Weisberg sued both the FBI and the AEC to gain disclosure of the results of the December-January Oak Ridge National Laboratory tests on the paraffin casts. He made no headway with the FBI, but the AEC's successor, the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA), anxious to avoid litigation, turned over the results to Weisberg in July 1981. The ERDA file can be found at the Weisberg Archive. The Commission turned to FBI firearms expert Cortlandt Cunningham, whose testimony was buried in Appendix X of the Warren Report under the rubric "Expert Testimony" to explain why Oswald's negative paraffin test on his right cheek was of no evidentiary value. Ignoring the results of the FBI's own authorized AEC tests on the rifle as well as Dr. Guinn's report to Gallagher, Cunningham testified that the chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tightly sealed that it prevented any blowback. It was Cunningham's professional opinion that given the construction of the weapon, "personally" he would not expect to find "any residues on a person's right cheek after firing" it. See WCR, 561