07-12-2012, 06:26 PM
Albert,
We have proven BOTH that it was Oswald's shirt AND that it was not Lovelady's. Have you read any of our studies about this? I am stunned at the gross incompetence displayed on this forum. We have done study after study, but none of you has paid any attention because your minds are ALREADY MADE UP. You are not even up-to-speed with HAROLD WEISBERG IN 1966! This turns out to be a collection of clowns.
Jim
We have proven BOTH that it was Oswald's shirt AND that it was not Lovelady's. Have you read any of our studies about this? I am stunned at the gross incompetence displayed on this forum. We have done study after study, but none of you has paid any attention because your minds are ALREADY MADE UP. You are not even up-to-speed with HAROLD WEISBERG IN 1966! This turns out to be a collection of clowns.
Jim
Albert Doyle Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Don't any of you "get it"? Harold Weisberg, WHITEWASH II (1966) had already figured this out. Billy even went to the FBI to show them the shirt he was wearing. It was a red-and-white, vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. We are confirming what Weisberg had already figured out in 1966 by studies of the photograph that could not have been done then! It was Lee in the doorway, not Lovelady. Lovelady also told Jones Harris that he was wearing the red-and-white shirt. He was emphatic about it. This must be the most incompetent research forum in history. The evidence is blatant. There is no doubt about it. Yet we have one denial after another! Denials are not proof. This forum has turned into a nut house. Even Phil Dragoo endorses obscure arguments when he cannot cope with the basic, obvious evidence. It is appalling.
Nope. You're just taking advantage of the fact Lovelady showed-up in that striped shirt for the the FBI pictures.
Dr Fetzer, you can't be relying on Cinque-esque claims that the subtle features of the shirt prove it was Oswald's shirt and then turn around and insist it was the striped shirt.
Do you see the mistake you've made there?