07-12-2012, 09:10 PM
Albert,
You are embarrassing yourself. Why would anyone go to the FBI and claim to have been wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt if they WERE NOT wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt? WOULD YOU DO THAT? He also told Jones Harris that he had been wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. WOULD YOU DO THAT IF IT WERE NOT TRUE?
I suggest you read Weisberg, WHITEWASH II. You are abysmally ignorant of the facts in this case. You are also ignorant of logic. It is a argument by elimination: It was Oswald or it was Lovelady. Oswald was wearing an old, expensive shirt. Lovelady was wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. Doorman's shirt matches Oswald's; Lovelady's does not. It was not Lovelady. Therefore, it was Oswald.
We have done so much on this--proving BOTH that it was Oswald's shirt AND that it was not Lovelady's that I have to infer you have read none of our studies about this. Either get up to speed--start with "JFK Special: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!" or cease and desist. You are displaying an appalling absence of understanding of the issues. I am not surprised, but why advertise it? Everyone knows it.
Jim
You are embarrassing yourself. Why would anyone go to the FBI and claim to have been wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt if they WERE NOT wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt? WOULD YOU DO THAT? He also told Jones Harris that he had been wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. WOULD YOU DO THAT IF IT WERE NOT TRUE?
I suggest you read Weisberg, WHITEWASH II. You are abysmally ignorant of the facts in this case. You are also ignorant of logic. It is a argument by elimination: It was Oswald or it was Lovelady. Oswald was wearing an old, expensive shirt. Lovelady was wearing a red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. Doorman's shirt matches Oswald's; Lovelady's does not. It was not Lovelady. Therefore, it was Oswald.
We have done so much on this--proving BOTH that it was Oswald's shirt AND that it was not Lovelady's that I have to infer you have read none of our studies about this. Either get up to speed--start with "JFK Special: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!" or cease and desist. You are displaying an appalling absence of understanding of the issues. I am not surprised, but why advertise it? Everyone knows it.
Jim
Albert Doyle Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Don't any of you "get it"? Harold Weisberg, WHITEWASH II (1966) had already figured this out. Billy even went to the FBI to show them the shirt he was wearing. It was a red-and-white, vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. We are confirming what Weisberg had already figured out in 1966 by studies of the photograph that could not have been done then! It was Lee in the doorway, not Lovelady. Lovelady also told Jones Harris that he was wearing the red-and-white shirt. He was emphatic about it. This must be the most incompetent research forum in history. The evidence is blatant. There is no doubt about it. Yet we have one denial after another! Denials are not proof. This forum has turned into a nut house. Even Phil Dragoo endorses obscure arguments when he cannot cope with the basic, obvious evidence. It is appalling.
Nope. You're just taking advantage of the fact Lovelady showed-up in that striped shirt for the the FBI pictures.
Dr Fetzer, you can't be relying on Cinque-esque claims that the subtle features of the shirt prove it was Oswald's shirt and then turn around and insist it was the striped shirt.
Do you see the mistake you've made there?