TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[James H. Fetzer]

This guy seems to think he can find any number of similarities in any two shirts, but that is simply absurd. I have observed that he has committed a simple fallacy of equivocation by misreading "points" as points rather than as features. Does this guy think that, for any two shirts, he can show they have the same upper right collar looping edge folds? narrowing upper right lapels? right lapel lengths? left lapels with rising collar edge folds? left lapel button loops? He committed a blunder and now appears to be unwilling to admit it--which is the sign of someone who has completely lost his bearings.

and the crowd goes wild....

sadly, changes not the fraudulent manner inwhich JF presents the probability two shirts in different photos exhibit similiar characteristics
or the probability they are either the same or different.

so that by default, only an idiot, by HIS definition, chooses the stated impossibility of them being so vastly similiar yet be in reality different shirts...
ergo, says JF... the shirts are the same.


Excuse me, this is Professor Fetzer, who must not have the resources at the University to first find out if his statements
about such probabilities will be correct. No math Professors where JF teaches... and Google must be too advanced a tool.

Thanks for the memories JF