08-12-2012, 10:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2012, 02:31 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
Albert, take a look at this official letter from the FBI to the Warren Commission stating that Lovelady claimed to have worn the red and white striped shirt. The exact wording is: "He stated he was wearing a vertical red and white striped shirt and blue jeans," which has been underlined at the end of the second paragraph. This is an official FBI report that was sent back to FBI Headquarters. Now if you were the person involved, would you go to the FBI and present yourself in a shirt that was not the shirt you had worn at the time of the assassination of the President of the United States? And would you have stayed inside when the motorcade passed by or stepped out to watch it?
And notice that in the pictures taken on 29 February 1964 (below), they had him pose with his shirt unbuttoned--like Doorman. But, why would they do that if he was wearing a different shirt? What would be the point of it? Obviously, they thought at the time that he was wearing the shirt from 22 November 1963. And notice how differently his unbuttoned shirt sprawls open compared to Doorman's. It's a totally different look, and that's because every shirt is different and behaves differently. It is obviously not the same presentation that we saw on Doorman. Notice also that the shirt is short-sleeved, whereas Doorman's shirt was long-sleeved. So they had to do something to get him out of that shirt.
I sense that you seem to be confused. There is no "aspect ratio" problem, and the fact that someone has made a claim does not make it true. You seem to believe anything those who are on the other side as though it were true, when you have no idea. Aspect ratio only affects the size of things. It's not going to create the kind of contrasts that we see between the FBI Lovelady and Gorilla Man. That's impossible. It's speculation that aspect ratio was a factor at all, but it cannot account for the differences that are seen.
Plus Shelley and Lovelady walked down to the railroad tracks after the shooting and were not even there when Oswald came out. He cannot have been talking about later, which we have explained in our articles. I am sorry, but you are really not cut out for this. The reason they had to resort to the man in the checkered shirt is that Billy Lovelady WAS wearing the red-and-white vertically striped shirt that day, which was such an obvious refutation of the government's position that they had to do all they could to undermine it.
And notice that in the pictures taken on 29 February 1964 (below), they had him pose with his shirt unbuttoned--like Doorman. But, why would they do that if he was wearing a different shirt? What would be the point of it? Obviously, they thought at the time that he was wearing the shirt from 22 November 1963. And notice how differently his unbuttoned shirt sprawls open compared to Doorman's. It's a totally different look, and that's because every shirt is different and behaves differently. It is obviously not the same presentation that we saw on Doorman. Notice also that the shirt is short-sleeved, whereas Doorman's shirt was long-sleeved. So they had to do something to get him out of that shirt.
I sense that you seem to be confused. There is no "aspect ratio" problem, and the fact that someone has made a claim does not make it true. You seem to believe anything those who are on the other side as though it were true, when you have no idea. Aspect ratio only affects the size of things. It's not going to create the kind of contrasts that we see between the FBI Lovelady and Gorilla Man. That's impossible. It's speculation that aspect ratio was a factor at all, but it cannot account for the differences that are seen.
Plus Shelley and Lovelady walked down to the railroad tracks after the shooting and were not even there when Oswald came out. He cannot have been talking about later, which we have explained in our articles. I am sorry, but you are really not cut out for this. The reason they had to resort to the man in the checkered shirt is that Billy Lovelady WAS wearing the red-and-white vertically striped shirt that day, which was such an obvious refutation of the government's position that they had to do all they could to undermine it.
Albert Doyle Wrote:Dr Fetzer you have already been told the gorilla Lovelady is due to aspect ratio. You have also been told that Fritz's shorthand contracted his recording to "Out" (meaning Oswald went out of the building) "With Bill Shelley in front" (meaning Bill Shelley was out front when Oswald went there). You also ignore your previous claim that Oswald's missing buttons were evident in the doorway shot. Credible research showed that Oswald's buttons were almost certainly torn-off during his fight with the police in the Texas Theater. Lovelady also had a round-neck T-shirt as the skin patches show. You categorically ignore all these fatal gaffes and return with yet another bombastic load of overload of information rubbish making the same already-refuted arguments.
What this comes down to is what you ignore. Like I said, have your test photographer come in here and discuss the skin patches with me.