19-02-2013, 10:11 AM
Don Jeffries Wrote:I've read all of Survivor's Guilt online. Unless Vince and/or his publisher appreciably changes the material, readers will reach the inescapable conclusion that JFK's Secret Service detail made his assassination possible. Again, unless the text is altered extensively, the book will clearly leave the impression that there was a conspiracy.
Vince doesn't post often at the EF. When he does, it's usually to promote something he wrote or put on you tube, or to answer someone's questions. However, he did answer Charles on Facebook, and reaffirmed that his infatuation with Bugliosi's book was only a temporary thing. I think it's obvious he now once again believes there was a conspiracy.
And herein lies the problem with Chicken Vince.
"JFK's Secret Service detail made his assassination possible" is a fatally ambiguous statement. Are the suspect actions and inactions of the detail the products of ineptitude and negligence, or do they represent the work of witting assassination conspirators?
Also meaningless is the claim that Palamara's book "will clearly leave the impression that there was a conspiracy."
"Leave the impression"???
Fifty years later, and a self-described "learned" student of JFK's murder is pussyfooting around, "leaving impressions"???
Will Palamara maintain his "both ways" stance: namely, numerous conspiracies were in the works to take out JFK, but Oswald "beat them to it" by acting alone?
As for Palamara "answering me" on Facebook: He first unfriended and blocked me from access to his material -- the actions of a physical and intellectual coward and a cheapjack hustler.
If Palamara wants to answer me, then let him come here and make his case.
I promise you, Palamara's days of having it both ways have come to an end.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene