27-02-2013, 01:26 PM
Jan
Your explication of the forum stance vis-a-vis Fetzer is very helpful.
Elsewhere I did 150 words on the single most compelling item of evidence of conspiracy.
Like a haiku or sonnet in iambic pentameter, the constraint is a discipline to conciseness
whereas the Fetzerian movement is to fixate upon the abstruse and mock those who don't see a laughing cow in a cloud formation
I sometimes think Charles and Seamus do endless variations on the Jack Nicholson "can't we all just get along" scene in Mars Attacks
[video=vimeo;40140338]http://vimeo.com/40140338[/video]
Fetzer is a fog machine, and this is war; the fog of war obscures justice
Hence eschewing Fogster in lieu of clarity such as Jan's statement is a path with heart
The contest on another forum was as stated below, with my answer:
Question: (A)"What is the ONE main item of evidence (ie Magic bullet etc.) that convinces you that JFK was assassinated as the result of a CONSPIRACY?
Answer in one hundred fifty (150) words:
Dr. Morton S. Mason, director of the Dallas County Criminal Laboratoroy, had processed Oswald's paraffin casts. Dr. Mason's report on the cast of Oswald's right cheek showed no trace of nitrates.
The casts were tested by the Atomic Energy Commission's Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the findings were negative, consistent with Dallas Dr. Morton Mason's testing results reported November 23, 1963.
Testing at Oak Ridge of the rifle allegedly used disclosed that every time the Mannlicher-Carcano was fired the paraffin tests showed positive for barium and antimony, gunpowder residues, on the test shooter's hands and right cheek.
FBI firearms expert Cortland Cunningham's protestations that the "chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tightly sealed that it prevented any blowback" to the contrary notwithstanding.
If Oswald did not fire the gun, there is no lone gunman; QED there is conspiracy.
Gerald D. McKnight, Breach of Trust, pages 209-212, notes 77-85, pages 422-3.
Your explication of the forum stance vis-a-vis Fetzer is very helpful.
Elsewhere I did 150 words on the single most compelling item of evidence of conspiracy.
Like a haiku or sonnet in iambic pentameter, the constraint is a discipline to conciseness
whereas the Fetzerian movement is to fixate upon the abstruse and mock those who don't see a laughing cow in a cloud formation
I sometimes think Charles and Seamus do endless variations on the Jack Nicholson "can't we all just get along" scene in Mars Attacks
[video=vimeo;40140338]http://vimeo.com/40140338[/video]
Fetzer is a fog machine, and this is war; the fog of war obscures justice
Hence eschewing Fogster in lieu of clarity such as Jan's statement is a path with heart
The contest on another forum was as stated below, with my answer:
Question: (A)"What is the ONE main item of evidence (ie Magic bullet etc.) that convinces you that JFK was assassinated as the result of a CONSPIRACY?
Answer in one hundred fifty (150) words:
Dr. Morton S. Mason, director of the Dallas County Criminal Laboratoroy, had processed Oswald's paraffin casts. Dr. Mason's report on the cast of Oswald's right cheek showed no trace of nitrates.
The casts were tested by the Atomic Energy Commission's Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the findings were negative, consistent with Dallas Dr. Morton Mason's testing results reported November 23, 1963.
Testing at Oak Ridge of the rifle allegedly used disclosed that every time the Mannlicher-Carcano was fired the paraffin tests showed positive for barium and antimony, gunpowder residues, on the test shooter's hands and right cheek.
FBI firearms expert Cortland Cunningham's protestations that the "chamber of the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tightly sealed that it prevented any blowback" to the contrary notwithstanding.
If Oswald did not fire the gun, there is no lone gunman; QED there is conspiracy.
Gerald D. McKnight, Breach of Trust, pages 209-212, notes 77-85, pages 422-3.