27-08-2013, 10:01 PM
This will be my final post on this issue.
I have now read through Rollie Zavada's Open Letter response to Doug Horne. Every one of the points I mentioned at the start of this thread is addressed by Zavada and in far greater detail. I concur with his analysis.
http://www.jfk-info.com/RJZ-DH-032010.pdf
This, I understand, will provoke howls of outrage. But advocates of extensive alteration have never addressed the fine points of Zavada's critique, and in fact are unable to demonstrate that they even understand the concepts underlying the critique.
Fevered imaginings based on the idea that the technicians at Hawkeye "could do anything" is not enough to take extensive alteration scenarios anywhere beyond pure speculation.
I have now read through Rollie Zavada's Open Letter response to Doug Horne. Every one of the points I mentioned at the start of this thread is addressed by Zavada and in far greater detail. I concur with his analysis.
http://www.jfk-info.com/RJZ-DH-032010.pdf
This, I understand, will provoke howls of outrage. But advocates of extensive alteration have never addressed the fine points of Zavada's critique, and in fact are unable to demonstrate that they even understand the concepts underlying the critique.
Fevered imaginings based on the idea that the technicians at Hawkeye "could do anything" is not enough to take extensive alteration scenarios anywhere beyond pure speculation.