27-08-2013, 11:14 PM
Jeff Carter Wrote:If any of the moderators want to PM me I will share with you my qualifications. I've briefly outlined them on another thread. Otherwise, frankly, I don't feel I should have to submit a resume or go into greater detail.
Everything I have said in this thread can and will be verified by any professional in the field who has worked in film-based optical effects.
I strongly note that the detractors on this thread have not offered a single technical critique of what I have shared. I also note that none of their surmises of what constitutes the possible in optical effects in film production consults any text, expert opinion, or even extant shot appearing in any film ever.
I have tried not to disparage any individuals personally even as I critique their understanding of the technical restraints in optical effect technology.
I'm the messenger here. I realized that flack would be sent my way, but someone had to say it.
Messenger? For whom and from where, Jeffrey?
Sad you feel that bad about your "qualifications" and ditto concerning your "technicians" qualification/experience. Ya picked the wrong subject matter if you and he want to jump start a career.
And how pray-tell, are the moderators going to evaluate your resume/qualifications, Jeffrey? Remember Jeffrey, in my business (film-video post-production) you're only as good as your last production. If folks or potential clients/producers want to evaluate your work qualifications, experience and ethic, they gotta see your stuff! If that's no good, there's no second step!
Where's your reel, Jeffrey? Where's your "technician's" reel? Mandatory from writers-producers-directors-editors-cameramen-soundmen applying for work with me. Then we can review your 'credit's' for same reel.
Regarding the "detractors on this thread". Listen champ, you only have to do one thing to get me into your camp, prove (at least get to second base) forensically, the alleged in-camera Zapruder film currently stored at NARA is in fact thee 11/22/1963 Zapruder camera original.... then I'll delve into your "understanding of the technical restraints in optical effect technology" then RZ's-Gang of 8 film gamma canard.
If Magda and the founders wants to shut this thread down, fine. But I'm not the least impressed, Jeffrey!
btw, thanks for your opinion(s), informed or un-informed.
And, here's my last question asked during my phone q&a with Kodak's Roland Zavada, years back: did KODAK manufacture double 8mm KodachromeII ASA25 and KodachromeIIA-reversal withOUT edge markings? After 20 seconds his answer: YES. Time to pow-wow with your "technician, Jeffrey! Have a nice day.