27-08-2013, 11:38 PM
Tracy Riddle Wrote:I don't know why this has become such an uncompromising issue for some people. We disagree about many aspects of this case, too many to list, but we all still accept that the official story is wrong. Why does the question of Z-film alteration have to be "you're either for us or agin' us"? Suddenly this has become a religion, and if you don't accept the immaculate conception or the Holy Trinity, you will be burned at the stake. The equivalent here is to be accused of being a disinformation agent. I find that really offensive.
What if I insisted that there was a shooter on the roof of the County Records Building, and anyone who disagrees with me is working for the other side? What if I declared that the head shot came from the South Knoll because Sherry Fiester's book "proves" it, and it's a fact and everyone who disagrees is now THE ENEMY?It's pretty ridiculous, right?
Is that what we want to do here? Think about it, people.
That's not what we're doing at all Tracy...
If YOU insisted on a CRB shooter... the overwhelming reply is SHOW US PLEASE....
It's not the exclamations that got Jeff in trouble... it's his refusal to offer anything that resembles sound logic or evidence to back his "expert" opinions.
Healy is right after all...
this isn't about ... "You're wrong"... but "Show us how you are right in your conclusions, opinions, guess, theories... whatever, so we can discuss it"
Rattling off a few posts with nothing accurate in them whatsoever is also NOT what we want to do here.... right?
(Looking back at the Doorman thread... 50+ pages of waiting for something from JF other than ad homs and speaking louder to aid comprehension... and all he kept screaming was, "It's obvious...!!"
WHY is the Pearse comment so important to the authenticity of the film? Let Jeff make a case, no?
I've said nothing about traveling mattes and still do not think it was necessary to produce what we see in the film today... DH feels it MAY have been necessary and could have been done in less than 2 weeks....
Except NPIC Sunday night makes the 2 week timeline hard to fathom.... we have the briefing boards... they're different from Dino's, per Dino, and MATCH the altered film.
Do the same deep black areas of JBK's hair overextend their boundaries within the photo simply becasue I pushed the contrast?
Which "technical hurdle" was not overcome to produce the black square covering the back of JFK's head?
turn out them lights...this party is over.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5180[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter