Technical Hurdles Suggest Extensive Z-Film Alteration Highly Unlikely

[Dawn Meredith]

This unpopular opinion should, I suppose, be its own thread. Here is what I have to say on this topic:


5) other than a possible patch on back of JFK's head and perhaps something at Z313, there is no visible evidence or trace of any alteration work.

There is an important problem that you did not address, and which has received little quality attention from defenders of the authenticity of the Z-film. ITEK determined long ago that the extant Z-film shows no ejecta leaving the back of Kennedy's head. Yet the doctors at Parkland were witness to an avulsive wound with the bones sprung open and a great loss of brain in the back of the head. So we have an effect without a cause, if the present Z-film is authentic. In fact it gets worse. In the present film we see a great loss of brain from the front - right of the skull (and presumably a great loss of skull as well). It's right there in the film. But what did Jackie say? "from the front there was nothing..." . So then we have an cause (a bullet seeming blasting the right front of Kennedy's skull) without an effect (no such wounding was viewed not just by Jackie or Hill but also at Parkland). No matter how much one tries to defend the extant film, there is simply no answer to this conundrum other than film alteration.

In 1975 I did my second research paper for college on this case. This paper was a direct challenge to one of the many CBS/Dan Rather bs "docudramas" on the case. CBS also relied on Cambridge- based ITEK and I was able to demonstrate that ITEK was little more than a CIA and front corp. for the Rockerfellers. So I would not trust any analysis by ITEK.

Just sayin'

Dawn