16-11-2013, 06:20 PM
I have not followed the assassination very closely since I read Anthony Summers some ages ago, but the case for conspiracy seems even stronger than it did back then. Kaplan, with his "buffs" and his "case closed" and his implied "exploding nerve" and his I saw it on TV so there, hardly needs debunkiing as he pretty much does that to himself. Home's presentation cited above, on the other hand, seems devastating to the LN theory. Has any genuinely credible researcher been able to undermine the evidence Home presents? For example, has anyone shown Mantik's analysis of the x-rays is less compelling than it seems? Has anyone shown why so many seemingly credible witnesses are willing to testify to a disappeared blow out in the back of President Kennedy's head? Seriously, Kaplan's case is so weak and Home's so strong, it's hard to even imagine a debate between the two.